1878.] W. Irvine —The 13 an gash JSFawdhs of Farrulchdhdid. 840 
* 
SiiAHPtJR. Muhammad Khan held this parganali before he went to 
Bundelkhand in 1189 H. (Aug. 1726—Aug. 1727). It was then resumed 
as part of the hhalsa or crown-lands and a grant was made for only one 
harvest. The Nawab held the parganali, however, for several years, after 
which it was again resumed. Through the intercession of Khan Dauran 
Khan, it was on the 10th Ramzan 1145 H. (18th Feb. 1783) granted per¬ 
manently from the Rahi harvest of 1140 F. (March 1733). This being a 
border district, some difficulty was caused by defaulters taking refuge in 
the estates of Rajah Hindu Singh of Chachendi. 
Itawah. In the later years of his life Muhammad Khan was faujdar 
of Itawah. He was displaced by Raj Adhiraj Jai Singh Sawae about 1153 
H. (March 1740—March 1741). 
Jalesar. Through Rajah Jai Singh Sawae, a lease in Yakut Khan’s 
name was obtained of Kokaltash Khan’s jagirs in this parganali. This 
produced an objection from Nasir-ud-daula Sadat Khan Zu’lfikar Jang, 
and the Emperor addressed a farmdn to Muhammad Khan, dated the 2nd 
Zi’l Ka’d of the 24th year (30th Dec. 1741). The lease was then relin¬ 
quished. 
Sattj and Ali-kiiera. The former was the jdgir of ’Amir-ul-Umra, 
Ivhan Dauran Khan ; the latter that of Farrah Khan Bahadur and Mu- 
hamdi Khan Bahadur. 
Baristah Sohar with a revenue of ten lakhs of dam was taken on 
ijara or lease by Yakut Khan from the jagirdar. 
Nidhpur, Akbarabad, and Sikandarptjr are mentioned as in the pos¬ 
session of the Nawab. In one year the estimated revenue of Akbarabad 
and Sikandarpur was put at 65,000, or at the outside 70,000 rupees. In 
1146 F. (1738-9) there appears to have been a drought. 
Koil and Sikandrah are stated to have been in the Nawab’s posses¬ 
sion in 1146 F. (1738-9). 
Sakith must have been included in the Farrukhabad territory, since 
Muhammad Khan was called on to furnish an escort for treasure coming 
from Jinnat-ul-bulad, Bangal. The revenue of Sakith is stated to have been 
one lakh of rupees, besides the jagirs farmed to the faujdar of Itawah. 
Kuraoli. Kaim Khan received 17 or IS lakhs of dam from this par- 
ganah as payment on account of the faujdari of Kanauj. 
Siiikohabad. This parganah appears to have been held as a dependen¬ 
cy on Itawah, in which Karhal does not appear to have been included. 
Bhokga'm and Taligram were in 1726 in the jdgir of Khan Dauran 
Khan. 
Anwalaii. This parganah was at one time the jdgir of ’Umdat-ul- 
Mulk ’Amir Kluin. 
