38 
W. Yost —On some rare Muhammadan Coins. 
[No. 1, 
Weight in 
grains and 
measurement 
in English inches. 
M 
307 
09 
316 
0’9 
As the letters, position and style of ornaments on 
coins Figs. 2 and 3 agree so minutely with those on 
Fig. 1, I think they must all have been minted at 
Shergarh. Mr. Rodgers believes a coin like Fig. 3, 
in the March Number of the Indian Antiquary for 
1888, to be a forgery. 
Plate II. Fig. 4. 
In square areas with a loop at the corners:— 
Obverse. 
Mint: Chunar. 
dt£Lc aJJ| olA. 
Upper margin , . &+) f^jf; right lower , 
illegible; lefty absent. 
Reverse. 
—xJf 951 H. 
Upper margin ... ; right ; lower and 
left illegible. 
Rupees only were known of the Chunar mint. 
Unique. 
II. Islam Shah, SurT. 
Plate II. Fig. 5. [Dr. W. Hoey, C.S.] 
Obverse. 
er*-^y I 
- m 
Initial** | 
aJJi 
j Axl/0 <.^l-"w 
Reverse . 
j|j> ( ?) 
• 
~ . y 9 
(?) *oJb 
(Date here not seen). 
