1895.] 
Mr. Bloclimann’s Ain. 
165 
No. 115 in the Lakhnau Tabaqat , and (2) the meaning of Jinkjank, I 
venture to suggest that the index may, under the head Mlrak , read in 
a second edition of Mr. Blochmann’s Am , as follows : — 
1. Mlrak Khan Bahadur Arghun (Jinkjank ?) 429, 439, 475 (No. 
208), 531, 532. 
N. B. —The references to pages 429 and 531 are omitted in the existing index. 
2. Mlrak Jalair, 52J. 
3. Mlrak Khwajah, 525. 
4. Mlrak Khwajah, Chengiz Khan, 442. 
5. Mlrak Mlrza, Rawazl Khan, 438 (No. 141). 
If it is justifiable to identify Jinkjank with Arghun a slight change 
will follow in the text, where at page 439 and in line 15, “ or with ” 
should read “ that is.” The insertion of Arghun after the name Mlrak 
on pages 429, 439, 531 and 532 would be useful to readers. 
