1895.] 
of the Modern Ivdo-Aryan Vernaculars. 
373 
A glance at the above will show the difference between the termina¬ 
tions of the Radical and the terminations of the Participial tenses, and 
the extreme improbability of their having a common origin. 
We can now construct the following Table of pronominal suffixes 
in the Indo-Aryan Vernaculars. 
1st Person 
tSing. Dir. 
Sing. Obi. 
Plur. Dir. 
Plur. Obi. 
2nd Person 
Sing. Dir. 
Sing. Obi. 
Plur. Dir. 
Plur. Obi. 
3rd Person 
Sing. Dir. 
Sing. Obi. 
Plur. Dir. 
Plur. Obi. 
iW 
IH 
§ 
o 
^7 IH 
K 5 
h ,5. 
OQ ^ 
IH 
ft 
ft 
X 
HH 
m 
ft 
ft 
t-H 
■I—i 
ft 
co 
H 
PQ 
im trj 
ft 5 
i—i 
ft ^ 
= a 
mo 
CO 
ft 
a 
CO 
CO 
<! 
ft 
ft 
£ 
ft 
m 
>< 
M 
ft- 
o 
ft 
ft. 
•<) 
ft 
-nj 
m, s 
m 
h (h) 
t (dat. 
y) 
Hi 
n 
n (dat. 
0 
m, s 
m 
se 
ve, o 
el (dat. 
*) 
ve 
ve, d 
me. se 
me 
si, su 
u, su 
e, e 
{el), e 
u, va 
va 
se (instr, 
*) 
'hi, 
ni 
ne (instr. 
u) 
an 
is 
au 
nasal 
nhi 
hu 
i r 
I .1 
}- nliiJ, 
i I 
J L 
ahu 
or i 
dh 
o 
want¬ 
ing 
a 
u, a 
am 
is 
a, e 
ah 
(dh), 
anh * 
anhi 
want¬ 
ing 
e, ek 
en 
u 
u 
u 
a 
e(?) 
u 
u 
a 
—.t 
The origin of most of these forms has been discussed when dealing 
with Ka^miri suffixes in my former article b I have there more 
especially given my views as to the derivation of the suffixes used in the 
North-Western languages, and in Biliari. Most of the remaining suffixes 
can be explained by a reference to those remarks. Taking them, person 
by person, we find the following results :— 
First Person. The termination ahu (Biharl), au (Baiswari), 
nasal (Baiswari), o (Assamese), u and its weakened form a (pionounced 
o in Bengali), u and u (Oriya and Marathi), can all be explained by the 
derivation given for the Sindlil iZ, the Ap. Prakrit Genitive Pluial 
amhahd ; or perhaps direct forms, such as the Oriya u , may come fiom 
1 Ante, pp. 345 and ff. 
J. i. 48 
