60 Philological Secretary— Report on old coins. [April, 
b, Jahangir, 1014-1037 A.H. = 1605-1627 A.D., type as in 
Br. Mus. Cat., No. 472, mint Qandahar, date lost, reg¬ 
nal year 12..... 1 
c, Shah Jahan, 1037-1068 A.H. = 1627-1658 A.D., type 
as in Br. Mus. Cat., No. 643, mint Patna, date 1067, 
regnal lost, month lost. 1 
d, AurangzIb, 1068-1118 A.H. = 1658-1707 A.D., two va¬ 
rieties, like Br. Mus. Cat., Nos. 731 and 777, mint of 
one Surat, dates [10]72 and 1109, regnal of one 41 ... 2 
(VII) Report on two old silver coins, forwarded by the Deputy 
Commissioner of Mandla, with his No. 2366, dated 12th November, 1894. 
No information is given in the letter of the Deputy Commis¬ 
sioner with reference to the locality and date of finding the coins. 
They are square rupees of Akbar, with the Kalimah, of the type 
shown in the Br. Mus. Cat., Nos. 127-151. Their dates are 1000 (in 
numeral figures, not expressed by alif) and 996. Their mints are lost. 
(VIII) Report on 24 old coins, forwarded by the Deputy Com¬ 
missioner of Rawalpindi, with his No. 2568 Gf., of I6th November, 1894. 
The coins are stated to have been found near Hasan abdal Tahsil 
Attock, in the Rawalpindi District. 
All the coins are of impure gold, and belong to the class known 
as “ Class B., Coins of the Great Kusans,” described by the late Sir 
A. Cunningham in the London Numismatic Chronicle, Part II for 1893, 
pp. 120-124. 
The present collection consists of coins of three varieties, distin¬ 
guished, as follows :— 
No. of specimens. 
First variety ; with two sub-varieties :— 
1st sub-variety: with the legends bha , sita and 
saka, as described and figured by Sir A. Cun¬ 
ningham, in (Ms) Plate II, No. 2, fig. 124 (l.c.): 13 
2nd sub-variety, with vi instead of bha . 1 
N.B .—The legend is ?aka, with long a, as Sir 
A. Cunningham rightly observes (l.c., p. 122) 
not saka as Thomas and V. Smith ( Journal , 
A. S. B„ for 1894, p. 182, footnote 2) read. 
The long a is indicated by the curve at the 
top of the right-hand stroke of the letter sh f 
which is distinctly shown in Cunningham’s 
figure 2. 
