158 T. Bomford — Pronominal Adjuncts in the Language spoken [No. 3, 
Plural 2nd Person. 
As Agent. 
E patte kiwe dittovhe, How have you given these particulars. 
Cu saza dittove, What punishment have you given. 
As Dative, 
Ke mareane, Who beat you (or them). Shahpur. 
Towards Shahpur the 2nd Pers., Plur. while retaining its own 
characteristic e, has adopted as its connecting link the letter i n ’ thus 
identifying itself with the 3rd Pers. Plur., which there, as in Baliawal- 
pur, is written ne. 
3rd Pers. Plural. 
As Agent. 
Salah kitonhe, They took counsel. 
Jerhe velhe zamin kll pationhe, When they dug up the 
ground. 
Muharl dihan kitonh§, The fishermen made a complaint. 
E galh akh pathionh§, They sent and said this. 
Tamasha dithonh§, They saw the tamasha. 
As Dative. 
Kai marionh§, Who beat them. 
It will be noticed that there is sometimes a short ‘ i ’ before the 
endings of 1st Singular and 3rd Sing, and Plur. This is easily 
accounted for— 
Past Participles are of two forms. 
a. That of maria, contracted probably from marija. 
These should have the i. 
h. That of kita, the older form of Past Participle. These should 
not prefix an i to the Pronoun ending. 
But they sometimes do to assimilate their compound forms with 
those of the other form. Sometimes too, I think to agree with a noun 
feminine. And compounds of the first form occasionally drop the i. 
IV. b. Past Participles of Transitive Verbs are found with two 
suffixes. One to represent the Agent, the other the object. 
a. Agent 1st Pers. Sing. 
JutamT jora—pani layamT, By me the pair was yoked for 
thee, the water was laid on by me for thee. 
Rupae dittumis, The Rupees were given by me to him. 
Rupae ditteimis, (Shahpur), 
Rupae dittumve, The Rupees were given by me to you. 
Rupae dittionum, The Rupees were given by me to them. 
Or, in the Bar, Rupeie dittemu. 
Cf. Kazmin dyutmas. 
