282 
R. Burn— The Bajragggarli Mint and Coins. [No. 4, 
The coin also has the double circle and dots noticed on 
Variety I. . i 
Subvariety (c). (My collection). It is exactly similar to 
(a), but the lotus is a little different. 6 It shows also a 
portion of the double circle and dots. 
No specimen of Variety III was received by me from Major Masters, 
but it resembles very much the next variety which is assigned by 
his informant to Ajit Simgh, son and successor of Jai Simgh. 
v • « - . : • • i, ' • , f ' * / 
Variety IV. (Plate XXXIV, figs. 4, 5.) 
This differs from the last variety in having a drawn bow-and- 
arrow on the obverse as well as the lotus on the reverse. 
The coins are very crude, and the full inscription is hardly ever 
to be found on any one. 
I find two subvarieties, differing in the spelling of the word 
Partap (viz., JPartap and JParatdp), the absence or pre¬ 
sence of three dots at the end of the top-line of the obverse and at 
the end of the bottom line of the reverse, and the spacing of the 
letters. 
Subvariety (a). Dates observed 22, 23, 24. (Fig. 4.) 
Obverse. Reverse. 
fa* 
Ji 1 W (U) 
a 
% ^ [*rc] 
Subvariety ( b). With three 
(Fig. 5.) 
Obverse. 
As in (a). 
§1 XT*? 
r 
^ ! Trrm 
* ( . 
* ^ % 
' J . ' J 
. z . , ■ ». * 
dots in bottom line of reverse 
Reverse. 
ft TT^T 
*PCT | rTT^T 
•: % 
'• • } * *> ' ■ * • u \ ./ 4 
8 [This lotus is shown in fig. 3 of Plate XXXIV; the form of the lotus on 
subvarieties (a) and (b) is the ordinary one, as shown in figs. 4, 5, 8, 9. Moreover, 
along the upper part of the right-hand margin of the reverse there are some 
indistinct traces; they might be those of a club. If so, this coin would not be 
a subvariety of Variety III, but would form a new variety by itself, with club and 
lotus on the reverse. I may note, that neither subvarieties (a) and (b) show any 
trace of a club. R. H. H.] 
