34 
G. A. Grierson— On the Kagmirl Verb. [No. 1, 
Negative form, Tcarctn chusn a , I do not make, &c., see 
p. 11. 
Interrogative form, W^JT karan chusa, 3Pn«T fg karan chus a , 
&c.j do I make ? see p. 12. 
Negative Interrogative form, ^\TI*T W*7«TT karan chusna , &c., do I 
not make ? see p. 14. 
Emphatic form, karan chusti, &c., 1 do indeed make, 
see p. 14. 
Emphatic Interrogative form, ^rrr«T WWIT karan chustya, &c., do I 
indeed make P see p. 14. 
In this, and in other periphrastic tenses, it is elegant to put the 
auxiliary before the verb (viii. i. 22, 23, 24) when standing in a sentence. 
Thus,— 
^ Tfj^T bat a clmh suh khyawan, he is eating rice, is 
more elegant than <^]«T hat a suh khyawdn 
chuh , though both are correct. 
ff^f ifcf *jn?rr taw a pat a chuli asanas 
pyath bihith puza karan , after that; he is doing worship 
having sat down on a seat, is more elegant than *T<T 
f%fV?T ^Tr 3»Tf«T taiv a pat a asanas pyath 
bihith puza karan chuh , though both are correct. 
So the following is the most elegant order,—WT3T«T 
igwar chuh asdn kagiy a andar , God exists in Benares. When, 
however, the verb stands by itself as in the paradigm, the auxiliary 
always follows. 
The following are examples of the use of pronominal suffixes, 
(pp. 15 and ff ) — 
«p? ^5Tf«T boh chus-ath karan , I make thee (viii. i. 37). 
^*TT«T as 1 chi-th karan , we make thee, 
boh chus-an karan, I make him. 
^ boh chus-as karan , I make for him. 
^ 3T^l*T boh chus-aw a karan, I make you. 
boh chus-akh karan, I make them. 
Similarly for the other persons, which are all regular, except 
suh chu-s karan , he makes him, or for him (not W*[ chu-n) (see 
p. 19). 
