I 2 I 
referred here by Mr. Dixon and apparently new to Britain.”— 
J. A. Wheidon. “ Perhaps it should be added Mons. Renauld 
qualified the ‘ var. setiforme ’ by saying it showed transition to- 
‘ var. gracile —H. N. Dixon. 
H. fluitans (Gr. amphibium ) v. atlanticum Ren., Abbeystead Fell* 
(60) , 10/01. J.A.W. and A.W.; also, Dawley, Salop, 8/01. Leg. 
W. H. Painter. Misit W.P.H. 
H. fluitans (Gr. amphibium) v. squalidum Ren. & Dix., Dawley, 
Salop, 6/99. Leg. Painter. Misit W.P.H. 
II. fluiians v. falcatum Schp., near Wellington, Salop, 8/01. 
Leg. W. H. Painter, comm. W.P.H. “I think rather a form of 
var. squalidum Ren. & Dix. “ Some of the lower leaves have the 
distinctly piliform apex of that var.”—J. A. Wheidon. “ I should 
refer this to var. squalidum Ren. & Dix., but it is not quite so well 
marked as the type of that var. Mr. Painter sent me what was 
probably from the same gathering, but a different form, the leaves 
more regularly falcate, broader at the base and with basal cells 
somewhat incrassate. The smaller tuft in the packet now received 
comes very near it, but it is slightly more like var. squalidum , which 
is better represented by the looser, larger tuft. It is probable that 
the former (and the plant sent me formerly by Mr. Painter) repre¬ 
sented a less aquatic state of the var. squalidum .”—H. N. Dixon. 
H. fluitans (Gr. Rota .) v. falcifolium Ren., Skip with Common.- 
(61) , 7/01. W.I. & C.H.W.; also, Denton Moor, Ilkley, 5/01. A.W. 
II. fluitans v. falcatum Schp. (Terrestial form of “ Anglicum- 
1101111” of Report p. 90). Screel, Kirkcudbright, 6/00. W.P.H. 
“ I cannot see the relation to var. Iloltii —except as belonging to- 
the same group. It is good var. falcatum —a very variable plant.” 
—J. A. Wheidon. “ I agree with Mr. Wheldon’s remarks.”— 
H. N. Dixon. 
H. fluiians v. Robertsice Ren. & Dixon, Craig-lyn-Dyfi, Aran 
Mawddwy (48), 7/01. Leg. Mrs. Bradford & H.N.D. Original. 
Station, H.N.D. 
H. fluitans (Gr. amphibium ) v. gracile Boul. f. submersa Ren.,. 
Greygarth Fell (60), 6/01. J.A.W. & A.W. “Mons. Renauld 
thinks this curious form entitled to rank as a distinct variety if 
found in other localities.”—J .A.W. 
H. fluita?is (exannulatumj v. pinnatum Boul., approaching f. 
stenophylloides Ren., Pitlochry Moors (89), 8/01. E.C. 
H. exannulatum v. pinnatum Boul. f. montana Ren., Denton 
Moor, Ilkley, 5/01. A.W. 
II. exannulatum Guemb. v. brachydictyon Ren., Duffs Loch,. 
Kirkcudbright, 6/00. W.P.H. 
H. verm cosum v. majus Ldb., Docker (60), 5/01 • A.W. 
