49 
Campylopus atrovirens var. epilosus Braithw. Quinag, Inchnadamph, 
Sutherland, July, ’99. Messrs. Dixon, Nicholson & Salmon. 
Dicranum Starkii W. & M. Meall Ghaerdie (= Ghirdy,) Perths., 
July, 1874. J. Whitehead. Com. T. Barker. 
D. fuscescens Turn. Helvellyn, July, 1897. E. B. Benson. 
D. majus Turn. c. frt. Saintfield, Co. Down, Oct., 1895. C. H. 
Waddell. 
D Scottianum Turn. Lower Lough Bray, Wicklow, 27 June, 
1898. H. W. Lett. —Loch Assynt, nr. Inchnadamph, Sutherland, 
July, 1899. Messrs. Dixon, Nicholson & Salmon 
D. strictum Schleich. On old pales, Blithfield Park, Staffs, June, 
1899. H. P. Reader. 
D. montanum Hedw. Tree trunks. Sheet Hedges Wood, Lei¬ 
cester, 30 Apr., 1899. A. B. Jackson. (New to v. c. 55.) 
D. uncinatum C. M. Glen Dubh, Inchnadamph, Sutherland, 
July, 1899. Messrs. Dixon, Nicholson & Salmon. 
D. asperulum Mitt. Wood by Loch Assynt, Sutherland, 23 
July, 1899. Messrs. Dixon, Nicholson & Salmon. 
Fissidens tamarindifolius Wils. Bank by the Adur, Southwick, 
Sussex, 24 Feb., 1900. W. E. Nicholson. “These specimens 
do not well agree with the description in the ‘ Handbook’ or ‘ Moss 
Flora,’ but they are very close to F. tamarindifolius , as in Wilson’s 
published exsiccata. Mr. Bagnall thinks that two rather different 
plants are known as F. tamarindifolius. The leaves are mostly of 
the tamarindifolius type, but the stems are short, as indeed they are 
in Wilson’s plants which I have seen. In any case the species is 
close to incurvus .”—W. E. N. “ Fasciculate barren shoots at base 
of stem, and leaves nearer the tamarindifolius shape than typical 
incurvus. Certainly not incurvus as we have it.”—J. A. Wheldon. 
“ * Stem taller and leaves more distant ’ than incurvus are points in 
which this specimen differs from the description, but these cha¬ 
racters are of less importance than the shape of the leaf, and I 
favour the view that this should be named F. tamarindifoliusl' — 
R. H. Meldrum. 
F. decipiens De Not. Old limestone quarry, Kendal, Westmore¬ 
land, Sept., 1899. C. H. Waddell. “ Cells too large for decipiens. 
This dark-coloured compact form of F. adiantoides is common on 
the limestone rocks of W. Lancs. It may be the var. collinus 
Mitt. ? ”—J. A. Wheldon. “ I agree with you that the Fissidens is 
rather a form of adiantoides than decipiens. The cells of this plant, 
while smaller than the typical form of adiantoides , are distinctly 
larger and less obscure than in decipiens .”—R. H. Meldrum. “The 
Fissidens is curious. I think it must be called a small-celled form 
of F. adiantoides , the cells being nearer in size to that, (about 11- 
15m.) and not obscure. F. collinus was described for a short chalk 
form I think. Braithwaite could find no difference in the size of 
