292 H. Blochmann— Geography and History of Bengal .—No. II. [No. 3, 
Sultan Balban, Emperor of Dihit. 
Muhammad 
(Khan i shahid). 
Na^ruddin Bughra Khan, 
Viceroy of Bengal. 
Ivai Khusrau. 
Sultan Mui'zzuddin Ivai- Sultan Ruknuddin Ivai- 
Qubad, Emperor of Kaus, King of 
Dihli. Bengal. 
Shamsuddfn Ffruz Shall, 
King of Bengal. 
Shihabuddfn 
Bughra Shah, 
King of Bengal. 
Na<jiruddfn, 
Governor of 
LaJc’hnault. 
Governor of 
Bihar. 
Ghiyasuddfn Bahadur Qutlu Klian. Hatim Khan, 
Shah, King of 
Eastern Bengal , 
then of the whole 
of Bengal, then 
Viceroy of 
Eastern 
Bengal. 
Muhammad. 
Descendants 
still exist¬ 
ing at pre¬ 
sent in 
Bihar. 
Of the other new Bengal coins given below, I may mention— 
(1.) A specimen of Jalaluddin Muhammad Shah’s coinage, of 831 A. H. 
(A. D. 1427-28), belonging to the Society; vide Plate XIII, No. 2. In 
my former Essay, I published coins of Muhammad Shah of 818 and 821. # 
(2.) A unique Gold Husain Shah of 907 (A. D. 1501-2), struck at 
Muzaffarabad. 
Husain Shah’s mint towns, as far as known at present, are Fathabad, 
Muzaffarabad, and Husainabad. Fathabad was in my former Essay identi¬ 
fied with the modern station of Faridpur. Muzaffarabad occurs in an 
inscription of Husain Shah’s reign, published by me in the Journal for 1872, 
p. 106.f The inscription mentions that Kukn Khan, “ Vazir of Muzaffar¬ 
abad and Kotwal of Panduali,” built a mosque at Gangarampur. We may 
therefore conclude that Muzaffarabad was the (now unknown) name of a 
place or district in the neighbourhood of Panduali. 
Husainabad is mentioned on Husain Shah’s later coins, as also on those 
* Mr. Laidley’s Muhammad Shah given on p. PI. IV, No. 8, Journal, A. S. B., 1846, 
resembles the specimen of tlie Society’s cabinet. 
f The legend as given there mentions Zafarabad ; but the mistake was corrected 
in the Errata for 1872. 
