60 W. Hoey —Set Mahet. [Extra-No. 
'R’T'^T anqi^cTT^: II 
ST^rTT l^^STOiPfl^: I ^r^r^^ST- 
SFT^- 5T^r?tf>^fr^t II mwrro^ 
WTJ % W I 5SJTOBT ^rr: fxpu^snW- 
^t ^farfsi^rfipw^: fs^wf ii rr?ffiw ^ 5 *rw*n*iT?t cpfr^rofr 
c\ ■* 
| f^r^rteT^T^t 5 ?^ % 5THT W*T- 
stprt ii fa^r*rwfor<r i w srsrfrr ^ *t 
|| ^*TT W f^^^r^wfafTT fit 1 
's# >9 
^ A. ^ ^ -^\ ^ ^ ^ »\ ^ ^ • *V ■—^\ 
Jwrwr'H ^TJi^tt^^r i 
vj vj O \J 
3i<c*r Jifw^r* ii w 
c\ \i 
jTorriiiPC^fat *jx?pjicr*? 1 ^rwlf%f*rwr *^*n 
^riritTitrf^fiT: f^frHrftp ii ^rr- 
r&y: sr^T*7<Tr i %*rrf^rr 
^\fx II 
w' % 
it^^Trrf iJijth tfarafarrearaw fc^sfi^^ir f^rc- 
f^f^iTT II I rftJJ ere^T^W^BTf^b* ^itfrf: 
it^TT^r^r i *rci fagj firmer: vif*r*p « 
l^cT II 
Om ! Salutation to him who has done with passions. 
May the revered and illustrious Sakya Sinlia wlio, having 1 curbed 
the Maras 1 by the eight-fold Path 2 for controlling the passions ; who, 
having directed the thoughts of the rulers of various quarters to the 
spread of righteousness; who, having ignored the imperial behests, 
difficult of avoidance, of Kama (lit. the enemy of Sanvara 8 ), in his pity 
1 This seems to be ‘ pluralis majesticus,’ or plural to cover the personification or 
phases of Mara : Kama. Krodha, etc. 
Ashta niyamya: ashta does not go with Maran but with niyamya, for it 
alludes, this being a Buddhist inscription, to the * eight-fold path ’ (see Oldenberg’s 
translation by Hoey, p. 128). 
Sanvara ripu: the enemy of Sanvara, i. e., Kama, the destroyer of the 
