216 
THE WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY • Vol 123. No. 2. June 2011 
Braun, E. L. 1950. Deciduous forests of eastern North 
America. Blakiston Co., Philadelphia. Pennsylvania, 
USA. 
Brown. J. H.. D. W. Mf.hlman. and G. C. Stevens. 1995. 
Spatial variation in abundance. Ecology 76:2028- 
2043. 
Buehler. D. A.. .(. J. Giocomo, J. Jones. P. B. Hamel. 
C. M. Rogers. T. A. Beachy. D. W. Varble, C. P. 
Nicholson. K. L. Roth, J. Barg. R. J. Robertson, 
J. R. Robb, and K. Islam. 2008. Cerulean Warbler 
reproduction, survival, and models of population 
decline. Journal of Wildlife Management 72: 646-653. 
Burnham, K. P. and D. R. Anderson. 2004. Multimodel 
inference: understanding AJC and BIC in model 
selection. Sociological Methods and Research 
33:261-304. 
Carpenter, J. P. 2007. Distribution, relative abundance, 
and habitat requirements of Cerulean Warblers 
(Dendroica cerulea) in northern Alabama. Thesis. 
Alabama A&M University, Normal, USA. 
Carpenter, J. P.. E. Soehren, A. A. Lesak, Y. Wang, 
and C. J. Schweitzer. 2005. Status of the Cerulean 
Warbler (Dendroica cerulea) in northern Alabama: 
1999-2004. Alabama Birdlife 51:1-11. 
Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). 
2005. ArcGIS. Version 9.1. Redlands, California, 
Freemark, K. E. and H. G. Merriam. 1986. Importance of 
area and habitat heterogeneity to bird assemblages in 
temperate forest fragments. Biological Conservation 
36:115-141. 
Hamel. P. B. 2000a. Cerulean Warbler (Dendroica 
cerulea). The birds of North America. Number 511. 
Hamel. P. B. 2000b. Cerulean Warbler status assessment 
USDI, Fish and Wildlife Service. Minneapolis 
Minnesota, USA. 
Hamel, P. B. 2005. Suggestions for a silvicultural 
prescnptton for Cenilean Warblers in the Lower 
Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Pages 567-575 in Bird 
conservation implementation and integration in the 
Americas: Proceedings of the Third International 
Partners in Right Conference (C. J. Ralph and T. D. 
Rich. Editors). USDA, Forest Service, General Tech¬ 
nical Report PSW-GTR-191. Pacific Southwest Re¬ 
search Station. Albany. California. USA. 
AMEU P. B. AND K. V. ROSENBERG. 2007. Brecdiri" 
habitat management guidelines for Cerulean Warbler 
H?rd S 3 ^p 374 IWcdm « s of "ic 15th Central 
Hardwood Forest conference (D. S. Buckley and W K 
Clatterbuck Editors). USDA. Forest Service, General 
bon a C h n P °N SRS ' 101 - Sl>u,hc ™ Research Sta- 
tion, Asheville. North Carolina. USA. 
M 2005a V - ROS ™“"' D. A, BUEHLER. 
^uu5a. Is management for Golden-winged Warblers 
and Cerulean Warblers compatible? Pages 322-331 ,>, 
the Amr CrV!,U n n ,WplemCinati0n illld integration in 
Parm ri- Pr0ceedin g s ">c Third International 
R j" p n ' ,g I h 'f 0nfcre ncc fC. .1. Ralph and T. D 
R.ch, Editors). USDA, Forest Service. General Tech 
meal Report PSW-GTR-191. Pacific Southwest Re¬ 
search Station. Albany. California, USA. 
Hamel. P. B.. M. Staten, and R. Wishard. 2005b. Initial 
Cerulean Warbler response to experimental silvicul¬ 
tural manipulations, Desha County. Arkansas. Paps 
3-9 in Proceedings of the 13th biennial .southern 
silvicultural research conference (K. Connor. Editon 
USDA. Forest Service, General Technical Repot: 
SRS-92. Southern Research Station. Asheville. Nonh 
Carolina. USA. 
Hamel. P. B.. W. p. Smith, D. J. Twedt. J. R. WoehuL 
Morris, R. B. Hamilton, and R, J. Cooper. 19%. A 
land manager's guide to point counts of birds in the 
southeast. USDA. Forest Service, General Technical 
Report SO-120. Southern Research Station. New 
Orleans. Louisiana. USA. 
Hanks, J. 1995, Biological tools. Version 0.2. Nacog¬ 
doches, Texas. USA. http://nhsbig.inhs.uiuc.edu/'** 
populations.html 
HtLL, M. O. and II. G. Gauch Jr. 1980. Detrended 
correspondence analysis: an improved ordination 
technique, Vegetatio 42:47-58. 
Hunter, W. C.. D, a. Bueiii-Er, R. A. Canterbury. J. L 
Confer, and P. B. Hamel. 2001. Conservation of 
disturbance-dependent birds in eastern North America 
Wildlife Society Bulletin 29 : 440-455, 
ItvtHOF. L A. 1976. Alabama birds. Second Edition. 
University of Alabumu Press, Tuscaloosa, USA. 
James, F. C. and H. H. Shugart. 1970. A quantitative 
method of habitat description. Audubon Field Notes 
24:727-736. 
Jones. J. and R. J. Roberston. 2001. Territory and nest- 
site selection of Cerulean Warblers in eastern Ontario. 
Auk 118:727-735. 
Jones, J.. W. J. McLeish, and R. J. Robertson. 2004. 
Predicting the effects of Cerulean Warbler, Dendroica 
cerulea , management on eastern Ontario bird species. 
Canadian Field-Naturalist 118:229-234. 
Jones, j.. r. d. Debruyn. J. J. Barg, and R J 
Robertson. 2001. Assessing the effects of natural 
disturbance on a neotropical migrant songbird. Ecol¬ 
ogy 89:2628-2635. 
Jones. K, C„ K L. Roth. K. Islam. P. B. Hamel. andC 
G. Smith in. 2007. Incidence of nest material 
kleptoparasitism involving Cerulean Warblers. Wilson 
Journal of Ornithology N9:271-275. 
JONGMAN. R. H. G., C. J. F. TER BRAAK. AND O. F. R. VaN 
Tongeren. 1995. Data analysis in community and 
landscape ecology. University of Cambridge Press. 
Cambridge. United Kingdom. 
Lawton, J H. 1993. Range, population abundance and 
conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8:409- 
413. 
Lt:i*s. J. AND P Smilauer. 2003. Multivariate analysis of 
ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge Univer¬ 
sity Press, New York. USA. 
Lynch, J. M. 1981. Status of the Cerulean Warbler in the 
Roanoke River Basin of North Carolina. Chat: 45:29- 
35. 
Macarthur, R. H. and J. W. Macarthur. 1961. On bird 
species diversity. Ecology 42:594-598. 
Microsoft Inc. 2003. Microsoft Office. Windows XP. 
Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, USA. 
