Carpenter et al. • CERULEAN WARBLER MICROHABITAT ASSOCIATIONS 
217 
MlNCHIN, P. R. 1987. An evaluation of the relative 
robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. 
Plant Ecology 69:89-107. 
Mirarchl R. E., M. A. Bailey, T. M. Haggerty, and 
T. L- Best (Editors). 2004. Alabama wildlife. 
Volume I. A checklist of vertebrates and selected 
invertebrates: aquatic mollusks, fishes, amphibians, 
reptiles, birds, and mammals. University of Alabama 
Press, Tuscaloosa. USA. 
Nicholson. C. P. 2004. Ecology of the Cerulean Warbler in 
the Cumberland Mountains of cast Tennessee. Disser¬ 
tation. University of Tennessee. Knoxville. USA. 
Noon, B. R. 1981. Techniques for sampling avian habitats. 
Pages 42-52 in The use of multivariate statistics in 
studies of wildlife habitat. USDA. Forest Service, 
General Technical Report RM-87. Rocky Mountain 
Forest and Range Experiment Station. Fort Collins. 
Colorado. USA. 
Oi.iarnyk. C. J. and R. J. Robertson. 1996. Breeding 
behavior and reproductive success of Cerulean War¬ 
blers in southeastern Ontario. Wilson Bulletin 108: 
673-684. 
Poole, A. (Editor). 2005. The buds of North America. 
Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology. Ithaca. New York, 
USA. http://bna.birds.comcll.edu/BNA/ 
Rich, T. D.. C. J. Reardmore. II. Berlanua. P. J. 
Blancher, m. S. w. Bradstreet. G. S, Butcher. D. 
W. Demarest, E. H, Dunn, W. C. Hunter, E. E. Injgo- 
Elias. J. A. Kennedy, A. M. Martell. A. O. Panjabi, 
D. N. Pashley. K. V. Rosenberg. C'. M. Rustay, .1, S. 
Wendt, andT. C. Will. 2004, Partners in Flight North 
American landbird conservation plan. Cornell Labora¬ 
tory of Ornithology. Ithaca, New York, USA. 
Robbins. C. S„ J. W. Fitzpatrick, and P. B. Hamel. 1992. 
A warbler in trouble: Dendroica cerulea. Pages 549- 
562 in Ecology and conservation of neotropical 
migrant landbirds (J. M, Hagan III and D. W. 
Johnston. Editors). Smithsonian Institution Press, 
Washington. D.C.. USA. 
Rogers. C. M. 2006. Nesting success and breeding biology 
of Cerulean Warblers in Michigan. Wilson Journal of 
Ornithology 118:145-151. 
Rosenberg, K. V., S. E. Barker, and R. W. Rohrbauoh. 
2000. An atlas of Cerulean Warbler populations. Final 
report to USFWS: 1997-2000 breeding seasons. Cornell 
Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York, USA. 
www.birds.comcll.edu/cewap/cwaprcsultsdcc 1 K.pdf 
Roth, K. and K. Islam. 2008- Habitul selection and 
reproductive success of Cerulean Warblers in Indiana. 
Wilson Journal of Ornithology 120:105-110. 
Rlnkle, J. R. 1992. Guidelines and sample protocol for 
sampling forest gaps. USDA, Forest Service, General 
Technical Report PNW-GTR-283. Pacific Northwest 
Research Station, Portland, Oregon, USA. 
Sauer, J. R., B. G. Peterjohn, and W. A. Link. 1994. 
Observer differences in the North American Breeding 
Bird Survey. Auk 111:50-62. 
Smalley, G. W. 1984. Classification and evaluation of forest 
sites in the Cumberland Mountains. USDA, Forest 
Service, General Technical Report SO-50. Southern 
Forest Station. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. 
SPSS INSTITUTE Inc. 2006. SPSS for Windows. Version 
15.0. SPSS Institute Inc.. Chicago, Illinois, USA. 
ter Braak, C. J. F. 1986. Canonical correspondence 
analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate 
direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167-1179. 
ter Braak, C. J. F. and P. Smtlaukr. 2006. CANOCO 
for Windows. Version 4.54. Bionielrics-Plant Research 
International, Wageiimgen. Netherlands. 
Usda Forest Service. 1995. Southern national forest’s 
migratory and resident landbird conservation strategy. 
USDA. Forest Service. Southern Region, Atlanta. 
Georgia, USA. 
Usda Forest Service. 2004. Final environmental impact 
statement for the revised land and resource plan. 
National forests in Alabama. USDA. Forest Service. 
Management Bulletin R8-MB 112B. Southern Region, 
Atlanta. Georgia. USA. http://www.fs.fed.us/r8/alabama/ 
planning/documents/feis.pdf 
Van Manen. F. T.. J. A. Young, C. a. Thatcher, W. B. 
Cass, and C. Ulrey. 2005. Habitat models to assist 
plant protection efforts in Shenandoah National Park. 
Virginia. USA. Natural Areas Journal 25:339-350. 
VlTZ, A. C. and A. D. Rodewai.d. 2006. Can regenerating 
clearcuts benefit mature-forest songbirds? An exami¬ 
nation of post-breeding ecology. Biological Conserva¬ 
tion 127:477-486. 
Wakkley, J. S.. M. P. Gitlfoyle. T. J. Antrobus, R. A. 
Fischer, W. C. Barrow, and P. B. Hamel. 2007. 
Ordination of breeding birds in relation to environ¬ 
mental gradients in three southeastern United States 
floodplain forests. Wetlands Ecology and Management 
15:417-439. 
WEAKLAND, C. A. and P. B. Wood. 2005. Cerulean 
Warbler (Dendroica cerulea) microhabitat and land¬ 
scape-level habitat characteristics in southern West 
Virginia. Auk 122:497-508. 
Wiens, J. A. 1989. The ecology of bird communities. 
Volume 1. Foundations and patterns, Cambridge 
University Press. New York, USA, 
Wood. P. B.. J. P. Duguay, and J. V. Nichols. 2005. 
Cerulean Warbler use of regenerated c learcut and two- 
age harvests. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33:851-858. 
Wood. P. B.. S. B. Bosworth. and R. Dettmers. 2006. 
Cerulean Warbler abundance and occurrence relative 
to large-scale edge and habitat characteristics. Condor 
108:154-165. 
Woodward. R. L. 1997. Characterisation and significance 
of song variation in the Cerulean Warbler (Dendroica 
cerulea). Thesis. Queen's University, Kingston, On¬ 
tario. 
Zar, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Fourth Edition. 
Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. USA. 
