708 
THE WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY • VoL 123, No. 4. December 2011 
canopy gaps. Thesis. West Virginia University, 
Morgantown. USA. 
Ritchie. M. E.. D. Tilman. and J. M. H. Knops. 1998. 
Herbivore effects on plants and nitrogen dynamics in 
oak savanna. Ecology 79:165-177. 
Robbins, C. S.. D. A. Bystrak, and P. H. Geissler. 1986. 
The Breeding Bird Survey: its first Fifteen years. 1965- 
1979. Resource Publication 157. USDI. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, Washington. D.C., USA. 
Rosenberg. K. 1999. Mid-Atlantic Ridge and Valley 
Physiographic Area 12-Executive Summary. Partners 
in Flight. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology. Ithaca. 
New York. USA. www.partnersinflight.org/bcps/ 
pl_12sum.htm 
Rosenberg, K. 2000. Ohio Hills, Physiographic Area 22- 
Executive Summary. Partners in Flight. Cornell 
Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca. New York. USA. 
www partnersinflight.org/bcps/pl_22sum.htm 
Rosenberg, K. V., S. E. Barker, and R. W. Rohrbaugh. 
2000. An atlas of Cerulean Warbler populations. Final 
Report to the USDI, Fish and Wildlife Service: 1997- 
2000 breeding seasons. Cornell Laboratory of Orni¬ 
thology. Ithaca, New York, USA. 
Roth, K. L. 2004 Cerulean Warbler breeding biology in 
Big Oaks National Wildlife Refuge, Madison, Indiana. 
Thesis. Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana. USA. 
SAS INSTITUTE Inc. 2004. SAS software. Version 9,1. SAS 
Institute Inc.. Cary, North Carolina. USA. 
Sauer, J. R. 1999. Combining information from monitoring 
programs: complications associated with indices and 
geographic scale. Pages 124-126 in Strategies for bird 
conservation: the Partners in Flight planning process 
(R. Bonney, D. N. Pashley, R. J. Cooper, and L. Niles. 
Editors.). Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, 
New York. USA. 
Sauer, J. R.. J. E. Hines, and J. Fallon. 2008. The North 
American Breeding Bird Survey, results and analyses 
1966-2007. Version 5.15.2008. USGS, Patuxent 
Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Maryland, USA. 
www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/bbs.html 
Thogmartin. w. e„ A. L. Gallant, m. G. Knutson, T. j. 
FOX. and M. J. Suarez. 2004. Commentary: a 
cautionary talc regarding use of the National Land 
Cover Data set 1992. Wildlife Society Bulletin 
32:970-978. 
U.S. Department of- Interior (USDI). 2006. Endangered 
and threatened wildlife and plants: 12-month finding 
on a petition to list the Cerulean Warbler (Dendroica 
cerulea ) as threatened with critical habitat. Federal 
Register 71:70717-70733. 
Vooelmann, J, E,. S. M. Howard, and C. R. Larson. 
2001. Completion of the 1990s National Land Cow 
Data set for the conterminous United States from 
Landsat Thematic Mapper data and ancillary da>a 
sources. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote 
Sensing 67:650-662. 
Weakland. C. A. AND P. B. Wood. 2005. Cerulean 
Wurbler (Dendroica cerulea) microhabitat and land¬ 
scape-level habitat characteristics in southern West 
Virginia. Auk 122:497-508. 
Welsh Jr.. H. H. and L. M. Oluvier. 1998. Stream 
amphibians as indicators of ecosystem stress: a case 
study from California's redwoods. Ecological Appli¬ 
cations 8:1118-1132. 
Wickham, J. D., K. H. Rutters, T. G. Wade. M. Cow 
and C. Homer. 2007. The effects of Appalachian 
mountaintop mining on interior forest. Landscape 
Ecology 22:179-187. 
Wood, P. B . J. P. Duguay. and J. V. Nichols. 2005 
Cerulean Wurbler use of regenerated clcarcut and two- 
age harvests. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33:851-858, 
Wood. P B., S. Bosworth, and R. Dettmers. 2006. 
Cemlean Wurbler abundance and occurrence relative 
to large-scale edge and habitat characteristics. Condor 
108:154-165. 
Zak, J. H. 1996. Biostatislicul analysis. Third Edition. 
Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. USA- 
