Barbula spadicea Mitt. Cole Green, Herts. March, 1897. H. 
Darton. Is B. rubella Mitt. — R. H Meldrum. 
Mollia ceruginosa Lindb. ( Weis 1 a rupestris C.M.) White Hall, 
Co. Antrim, 1891. Coll., Rev. S. A. Brenan. Com., Rev. H. W. 
Lett. {Vide Appen Flora N.E. Ireland, p. 222.) “ Weisia viridula 
Hedw. Leaf-margin incurved, peristome present.”—H. N. Dixon. 
Philonolis fontana Brid. Approaching P. adpressa. Strensall Com¬ 
mon, Yorks., 4.1.’97.—W. Ingham. “ A curious form.”—H.N.D. 
Webera annotina Schwg. ? Old mud by Stroud Canal, Glos., 
1885. G. Holmes. “Is Bryum erythrocarpum. The sterile shoors 
rigid and with some axillary bulbils give the appearance of a 
Webera." —H. N. D. 
Webera Ludwigii var. elata Schpr. Ben Challum, Perthshire. 
Rev. C. H. Binstead. July, 1885. Com. C. H. Waddell. 
“ There appears to be no very clear line of demarcation between 
the var. elaia and var. latifolia Schp. Limpricht describes latifolia 
with entire leaf-points, elata with more acuminate sharply serrate 
points In this specimen they are almost entire Specimens 
which I gathered in the original (and only recorded) station on 
summit of Ben Lawers have them decidedly serrate as described 
by Limpricht. On the other hand Mr. Binstead’s plant has the 
leaves much shrunken and almost twisted when dry, which 
Limpricht describes as characteristic of elata , and which is not 
markedly the case with latifolia. It would seem, therefore, to 
stand somewhat between the two varieties.”—H. N. Dixon. 
Byrum cernuum (Sw.) Lindb. {B. uliginosum B. & S.) Glen 
Docherty. W. Ross. E. S. Salmon, 8.’96. “ Bryum bimum. 
Peristome perfect.”—H. N. D. 
Bryum mtermedium B'rid. Loc., date and coll. ? “ Is B. pendulum 
Schp. This latter species seems to be often misunderstood by 
beginners, though its curiously-reticulated peristome should render 
its identification comparatively easy for a Byrum." — W. E. 
Nicholson. 
Bryum argenteum var. majus B. & S. On canal mud, Bow- 
bridge, Stroud. E. J. Elliott. “ My specimen is probably B. 
atropurpureum. Leaf entirely chlorophyllous, concave, short-pointed, 
nerve reaching apex but scarcely excurrent.”—H. N. D. 
Neckera pumila var. Philippeana Milde. ? Near Kendal, March, 
1886. Rev. C H. Waddell. ‘ I should not call this the var., 
though there is here and there a branchlet with the characters of 
the var.”—H. N. D. 
Cylindrothecium concinnum Schp. The Cemetery, Stroud, Glos. 
G. Holmes. “ Is it native or introduced with granite from higher 
regions?”—R. de G. Benson. “Is this moss not entirely 
calcicole ? I think it is often overlooked. It grows at Kendal 
in open places on short limestone turf. Those who do not know 
it may confound it with H. purum or Schreberi " — C. H. W. “ Native 
and abundant on bare open ground, also at Rodborough Common, 
near Stroud.”—G. H. “ Woodchester, and many spots on the 
oolitic hills”—Rev. H. P. Reader. 
