142 
Camptothecium nitens Sch., Ochils (88), 4/91. R.H.M. ; Hales¬ 
owen, Worcestersh., 9/02. E.C. ; and Lochan na Lairige, 
Perthsh., 7/02. Ll.J.C. 
Brachyihecium salebrosum v. palustre Schp., Shirley (57), 5/02. 
W.R.L. “Without fruit I cannot separate this from B. rutabulum. 
I cannot dispute the above name, but it might just as well go under 
B. rutabulum.—-W . 1 . Perhaps the species are mixed together.” 
B. rutabulum B. & S. var., near Carnforth (60), 4/02. J.A.W. 
“ I send a form of Brachylhecium rutabulum , which occurs on dry 
limestone rocks. It is a large 4 rambling ’ form which differs 
materially in habitat and habit from var. robustum , to which a mem¬ 
ber of the Club suggested to me that it belonged. With us var. 
robustum is a green compactly tufted plant, often growingin cushions 
in damp places, borders of ponds, &c. The present plant is 
yellowish, stems arched and straggling, and occurs in dry, rocky 
places. Has it a varietal name ? ”—J.A.W. “ It does not seem to 
come under any of our named varieties. I gather the same form 
on bare banks by dykes in limestone districts.”—W.I. 
Brachythecium rutabulum v. robustum B. & S., Walton (59), 11/97, 
J.A.W. 
B. rivulare B. & S., Chatburn (59), 8/98. J.A.W : v. chrysoleucon 
Spr., Cannock Chase (39), 12/00. H.B. 
B. plumosum B. & S., Chorley (59), 4/01. H.B. 
B. ccBspiiosum Dixon, Coughton Court (38), 3/93. J.E.B ; also, 
Linduden Abbey. Kirkcudbright, 8/02. W.P.H. 
Eurhynchium cirrosum Jur., Ben Lawers (88), 7/02. Ll.J.C. 
E. pumilum Schp., Killeen Glen, Co. Down, 3/98. C.H.W. ; also, 
Hawkesyard, Staffs., 3/02. H.P.R. 
E. curvisetum Husn., Alfriston, Sussex, 1/00. W.E.N. 
E. tenellum Milde., Harlech Castle (48), 11/02. D.A.J. 
A', viyosuroid.es var., On trees, Harlech (48), 12/02. D.A.]. 
“I had a small specimen of Mr. Jones’ very small E. myosuroides 
before. It was sent to Mr. Bagnall, who suggested that it be de¬ 
scribed as var. minus. It appeared to me, however, to be too near 
some already described forms, notably var. filescens Ren., and forma 
humilis Gravet, for this to be desirable, and I should refer it to var. 
cavernarum Mol., under which var. Limpricht unites the two plants 
mentioned above Boulay’s remarks on them may be cited. 4 Sur 
les roches tres secs et ombragds_la plante se rabougrit, les 
branches principales restent greles et courtes, peu divisebs (f. 
humilis Gravet in litt). Ailleurs principalment dans les Pyrenees, 
.les tiges et les rameaux s’ allongent et s’ effilent, les feuilles 
deviennent lanceolees, tres etroites: la plante ressemble alorsd la var. 
filiforme du If . cupressiforme (f. filescens Ren.) ’ I have no specimen 
