1877.] 
explanation of the Jyotisha-Yeddnga. 
413 
I am indeed unable to point out, but where nevertheless Somakara’s want of 
understanding is patent. At first however I reprint the text of the Jyo- 
tisha, only for convenience’s sake, since frequent references to it will be made 
in the following pages, not with the intention to give it in a purer form 
than that known up to the present time. A few corrections of the tradi¬ 
tional text will be given later on ; the necessary critical apparatus for the 
restitution of those verses which are manifestly corrupt, and for which I am 
unahle to propose emendations, will he found in Prof. Weber’s edition. I 
consider it superfluous to reprint here the different readings of the MSS. ; 
the verses of the Jyotisha are for the greater part of such a nature that the 
restitution of the single words of the original text can only be accomplished 
after we have found out by some other means the probable sense of the 
whole verse. I follow the arrangement of Prof. Weber’s edition giving at 
first those verses which are found in the recension connected with the 
Yajurveda and then adding these which belong to the Rik recension only. 
q^‘q<^T^ q^TTqfrnp | 
fitter u ^ n 
^Tfrrqr«re»f q^ qq^jug^rqqqi: i 
11 ^ n 
qqy qfrqrrqqqir fa ^rrrg : i 
WTf^ q>T<*rf^r5jT^rsw % ^rfrp* q^ qq; qw n q n 
qTJnqf *r<n^T i 
qqtqTlpSTOT^t aifqrrf f^IcHT II 8 || 
qiqs^Twrfq^: i 
q^qw qtT^Tff II * || 
%T*iTiT ■qqr *?qiqqT i 
TfTWq: II «( || 
qqqjq qfqsrf t ^qrq^^rq^qf i 
*?rqqiqqr%; n ii 
q^qfeyqf vw w^ig ^q*qqr i 
fqq^m; thus a 
si ^ 
q*m I 
^rpi #q fqqwqj n e a 
qw^r ^qn^ fqq; wsfiqqq i 
qT<TT qrgPfiTTqjT: II \o || 
qquqrqspj? ^ qqT«gj?errfq;qq*:: i 
qpIqT? q^qqmf ^ a » 
qq ^fq; qi^ftqsrq *mqvT I 
