L Y C2EN0PSINLE. 
203 
Logania distanti, Staudinger, Lep. Palawan, p. 93, pi. 1, fig. 3, 9 (1889). Semper, Reise, Philipp, 
p. 161, pi. 31, figs. 6, 7 and 21 (1889). Logania obscura, Distant and Pryer, Ann. Mag. Nat. 
Hist. 1887, p. 266 (nom. prseoc.). Habitat, Philippines, Borneo. 
Logania luca , de Niceville, Journ. As. Soc. Bengal, 1895, p. 29, pi. 2, fig. 13, 9 • Habitat, Perak, 
Malay Peninsula, Sumatra, 
Logania staudingeri, H. H. Druce, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1895, p. 565, pi. 31, figs. 13, $, 14, 9 • 
Habitat, Kina Balu. 
Sub-Family LYC^ENOPSINS, 
Genus LYCHENOPSIS. 
Lyceenopsis, Felder, Reise, Nov. Lep. ii. p. 257. Chapman, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1809, p. 419. 
Cyaniris, Scudder (nec Dalman), ii. p. 918 (1872). Moore, Lep. Ceylon, i. p. 74(1881). Distant, 
Rhop. Malayana, p. 210 (1884). de Niceville, Butt, of India, iii., p. 92 (1890). Bingham, 
Fauna of Brit. India, Butt. ii. p. 315 (1907). 
Celastrina, Tutt, Entom. xviii. p. 180 (1906). 
Notarthrinus, Chapman, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1908, p. 677. 
Eyes naked. Antennae less than lialf the length of forewing, club long and spatu- 
late ; palpi sub-porrect, second joint pilose beneath, projecting half beyond the head, 
third joint naked, slender, and about half its length ; body slender; legs slender; 
femora slightly pilose beneath. Fort wing broad and short, costa slightly arched, apex 
rounded, outer margin convex, hinder angle slightly rounded, hinder margin nearly 
straight; cell half as long as the wing; vein 3 from before lower end of cell, 
4 from the end, 6 from upper end, 6 and 7 closely approximate at base, upper 
discocellular therefore very short or absent, middle and lower very slender ; vein 
8 absent, 9 emitted from basal half of 7, 10 and 11 free, 12 bent towards 11, ends on 
costa a third before the apex. Hmdwing with the costa slightly arched, apex and 
outer margin continuously rounded ; cell half as long as the wing, middle discocellular 
shorter than the lower; veins 3 and 4 from lower end of cell. 
Type, haraldus, Fabricius, from Sumatra. 
We are obliged to put Chapman’s genus as a synonym, because it is erected on 
the genitalia only, and for all practical purposes this is useless. The genus Cyaniris 
seems to have been here misplaced by many authors ; Trout has called attention 
to the fact that Dalman gave semiargus,- Rottenburg, as his type for Cyaniris, and 
semiargus does not belong to this genus; we must take Lycsenojosis, Felder, for the 
genus, his type haraldus being congeneric with the Indian forms. 
2 d 2 
