A utocar -us integrifolia Linn, t il, Suppl. igi 2 
Fosi: iule aynonyms are : - 
Ra d e r a chia i n t e t r a 
Si tod ium; naerocarpo n Thumb. 
iu 1 0. (il 
e 1 . A, 
i>) 
1 7 ' 7 A 
* / / V 
Thunb. 
(Ref. 
C) 
1 ?'A 
Gaer tn. 
(Ref. 
H) 
1 78 C 
(Ref. 1 ) 
1 78? 
r 
1 7 A : 
^ylla'La 
•m, (Ref 
M T) 
Fclyohewa ja ca Lour. <Ref, J) 
This species of Linneus fil. has oeeri interpreted as the Jack- 
fruit (sec Ref.L)- 
Merrill proposes for it the new combination A. into* rs (Thurfe.) 
Merrill. 
Re narks 
1. On consulting the orIrina] desert tion of A . intoorifolia T fil. 
{ Ref.£: I find that it refers beyond all count to the Ghempecak and 
not to the J;-ck-f: uit. Thus these remarks - 
**r a mu ] i e t. pe? d u n c u 1 \ p ilia 1 orip is hi rsu t i 
’’Folia, .... £>u o ter i i i i s "i. i d i s h i r au ta ’ 
are character I . tl c of the Choia/pedsk (see truest ion J} • 
2 # It -seems that the three no les - A rt ■ icatyuo inte* ri f o l ia. 
Radegiachi a Inte gra art Sit >d ium v a o r oca r p on - were uhi <r- sed on the sane 
specimen of Rsderriucbor r ixi grunD^rv l ivex*oariuuj . t upps&la v t '* which 
I have written' . T eor.clu e tha- those names refer to the Che r-pedsk 
and rot to the Jack fruui. 'rich name is earliest ut penes on wn ether 
Rad err. a chi a or 2 i torn urn --re validly uuol i the ) oe 'ore Linr-eus .^i 1 . 
Supplement ( i 7• 0 ■ ( see ny reworks urn t Jagc uchia ano Questions 
1 . + , C). It, 0; it seems, Thor. ourg ' ;a-.\ea -re Invalid, then the 
old st name ir a, in ir ■" ifo 1 ia . Jerr ill's no- combination may therefore 
De mval id. 
5 „ It seems, therefore, that the ear '’lost name foe the Jack- '*ru 1 1 is 
3 i todium cau l if ) rutr Goertr. . - a forgotten n-ie, f or »f ich the rew 
combination r t o e a r ui : cn u 1 if] o ru t : (Gaertn. ; v, ill have to be race. 
There is no inherent objection to tnis, because G-teriner iivjs a very 
detailed description srd aert; mte illustrations Io*ever, it is 
possible that A r t oc t. r u s J a cal , a m, i a an earlier name \ see Question J) , 
H o '.v ever, a s r e yards S i t o d i u r, : no rorocar, o n , s a e qu e s t i or 4 ( & t t he end) 
&ne guest. 1 }, 
4 „ Art ocarpu s he to rophyl 1 a Tar. i ?• 1 *eouced to A. i n tegri .’ol is ( leanin g 
the Jack-fruit; (Ref . L;. I an not til sure that this is right. 
(see qu # stion J ). 
a 
As regards F olyphema j oes Tour., ere question g. 
6 . It seems tbs r this confusion, /'hereby the name *1, i n t egrif o lia was 
given to tne Jack-fruit though it was oaseu on the GheiBpecak, was 
started by 1 i 2 1 denow (R 3f. K) and v*u 3 propagated by R oxourgo (PI. Cororn .) , 
Sprenge 1 (Lyst.Vog* j , p. 80.4) and hooker sen, (Ref 1 L; . 
y 
t 
fee Question 1C 
mg? 
