“ G — 
Questions and Investigations 
1 . Look up Reference A* 
Is Raderaachia validly puoilshed as a genus by Thunberg in 
this pi .... ce ° Are the spe e ie 3 va 1 i a 1 y public he a? 
If it is, then would you kindly sene me copies of Thunder# ’8 
descriptions of the genus and of R. inciea and R . in tear a , with 
the references. 
L. B. If he descriptions are in Swedish only, or the generic 
character* is not clearly stated, I think that the genus ana the 
two species are invalid at that date. 
2. If KademacMa w validly published in 1 //£ . was it earlier 
than Artocare ub Foret, (ref. 8; 0 
If Rademachia is valid and curlier, then Artocerpus must 
be conserved against Rademachia- 
5 . look uo Ref. B. 
04 
re a 3 
ly 
cue 
*. 
11 
uh 
f; 
b i n 
on 
1 7 'f 
L U a. 
■ ii't.0 
_ n, 
e : 
\,b) 
^ r 
t to 
e 
•JX* 
d c 0 
luinun 
oe c i 
as 
U- 
c* 
w * 
•4 V 
L k 
( fC’ 
Bre 
ad 
- f ru 1 
t * r 
\»*N 
Wft 
com 
m on 
» 
a i 1 h 
the 
i 
nt'jfla 
ti or; 
ibed 
JU 
Vv 
■>U 
Id 
be 
la 
te 
r c 
If (a) ia answered 'Yes 7 f then the Bread-fruit Tree is A .c o m muni s 
If (t) in ensuered fee ’ , then there is no such nusie as 
A.communis and the Bread-fruit Tree is A.Incisuo Linn. f. 
4 . look up Ref. C- 
I s Sitooium 3 i t od i a ) va 11 d 1 y p u b 1 i ah e d he re b y V hu n b e rg or , a s 
a generic name, is It a nomen nudum? 
I s 3 . m a c rocarp op v a 1 idly pi 1 b 1 i a he d he re 0 
If validly published, rould you kindly send ne u cop, of the 
description an .1 also a copy of - he descript ion of 31 tedium m acroca roori 
t age t he r wit h ref renee s . 
If validly juolished C. grcrocarpon may oe the earliest name for tir: 
Jack-fruit Tree, or it' may be the Chempedak, 
h? ^ Go 
