v» 
- 
\ 
Bo tani o Gardiftft , 
I f. • ■ . V 
nyaper©* 
V / 
B4th;. January, 1916 
* 
Dear Hr. Wolf©rutan, 
X did net fcnov that Misholl had put tew® 
iB # rrn a$ th® atm which niyht reasonably be paid tc 
the F>K*n> Derartnent of 4yrimature for locust- 
destruction; but J. In&yin® that ho vfouXd now rut 
it at a higher rate for in 19X5 the v ote with 
its extensions amounted to $XC,8CCi* 
»1owXey**Brr^n would net * r acte any of it: and w® 
■» 
nay wsl X nay that on® need officer super vising 
whole tin© can carry out work amounting to that in 
value. The amount includes Cowl sy-eBrown salary. In 
? fvjL o*j 
addition to that, the Government spent a tittle in 
ny tin® and travelliny exp ernes, which a a I trusted 
tevrley*iBr©im completely, did not ar.cn nt to nuohj* 
h T ow supposiny that th® ?,&;,*% should scud irn 
an office.'* capable of getting thorny?: ay nnoh an 
Cowley-Brown, a fittiny regard for then would be 
r 10,Pee plus th® coat of th® tin® and travellings 
ef th® Ay ri cultural Inspector who supervises that officer 
■ t i *> 
3 ay p5O0> Therefor® .A 1C ,?or -till b® a reasonable 
reward!* 
But 
I do 
not 
lik® 
th® proposal 
exactly 
an 
stands;. 
*hat I 
a ho* 
a d r 
a. 
refer in that 
th© r\ 
? * c*. 
► i i;# »>;* 
should 
receive 
only 
th® 
regard fof* th® 
tin® 
and 
travel liny of th® Ay ri cultural Inspector* while the 
°«*cnr TX'n i+>a c-n hills for Vw ©xowtiv. officer 
lP- 
and th® labour. ’That I should like beat of all is 
$ v■ \) of ilUlt? If 
:■')■ 
r ! AN 
