— 
\'.h , 
•.%# , • t . i • 
J 
MU ■ k 
a 
27 / 34 * 
6 th March, 
4 
Dear Symington, 
Your Nos.2 and 19 in F.R.O.48/54* Herewith 
remarks on your notes, at least from some of the specimens. 
S f pore 18527 - Yes. Matches our scanty material and agrees 
with Parkinson's figure of Xyloc arpus moluccensis . 
S'pore 19522 Perhaps Polyalthia I could not make out 
certain structure. 
•> 
19654 I agree. Will have to leave it at that till 
rt 
flowers turn up. 
'• . _ , -. 6 * 1 . ’■ m ' 
19805 Certainly very close to Pasania splicata var 
pracilipe s, except that in our specimens of this the 
acorn is usually more flattened above and the cupule 
looks slightly different. Distributed now under P_ 
if 
9 splicata v. praci li pes 
21199 Put under Chi socheton diverpens in the meantime. 
Berlin may clear this up in due course 
ft 
21675 Now distributed as Knexna ?Curtisii . 
>1715 can’t trace a species called Anti de sma hirsutulus 
Ridl. It is not A.hirtellum , Ridl. 
n 
21726 vetria trewioides , Baill. is apparently a synon^ 
of W.macrophylla , J.J.S. The only difference I can see 
between 21/26 and mac rop hyll a is the increased pubescenc 
on under surface of leaf. V.ma c rophy l la is apparently 
variable in leaf shape but fairly constant as to 
pubescence. I should be inclined to put -1/26 under 
macrophylla 
I*; »/** 
CSymington, Hsq., 
Forest Research Institute, 
Kenong. 
