It is requested that the 
following number be quoted 
in the reply to this letter, 
and that replies be addressed 
to the office, and not to in¬ 
dividuals by name. 
No,.... 49.in.F.JR.O • 48/34. 
FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE, 
KEPONG, SELANGOR, FED. MALAY STATES. 
14thAugust, 19 34. 
Dear Henderson, 
Thanks for yours of 7th instant, and for 
the identifications of Elaeocarpus . I felt there was 
something wrong with these identifications - I matched, 
or thought I did, 15667 and 17107 with sheets under the 
E.leptomiaohus coyer at Singapore hut on examination later 
I found that they did not fit the description at all. Can 
you tell me what C.F. 1779, 6433, 1178,and 12613„ and S*p. 
J 1 OQSB^are ? They have been identified by you and Burkill 
as E.Griffith!i but are different from the above. Are they 
E.Mastersii ? If you have no duplicate of C.P.1779 or 
the others I can send you our sheets. 
Oreorhamnus serrulatus Ridl. - We have 3 
collections of this from Cameron Highlands (where it is not 
uncommon) and one (a duplicate of yours) from Gunong Korbu. 
Fischer identified one of our collections and Haniff's Korbu 
collection as 0,serrulatus . Haniff*s collection bears two 
numbers, 3964 and 16305, and Ridley has identified it as 
" Ardisia 1 1 ♦ At Kew I saw what I think is a collection very 
close to this under the cover of Ardisia petricola . It is 
probable that you will find one or more collections 
r 
of the species among your Ardisia . We ought to have some 
c 
duplicates of our collections but I have not been to lay 
A 
M#R. Henderson, Esq., 
BotanicGardens, 
Singapore. 
MBT. 
