Hiptage, Haniff and Hur 4007 or 40 O 4 says Grail),is 
not H. sericea,^which it iscalled apparently in 
the Singapore ^erbarium 
Irapatiens, Ridley 15035, says Craih, is not I.Vaughani, 
which thus is confined to Pattani 
Glycosmis A *aniff and Nur 7062, placed as G.puberula at 
JC»PSMXXS in my accession list, hut a 0. 
rupestris, is says Craih, not G.rupestris. I 
have got it as citrifolia is ray/interlsaved Kid 
ley. 
Glycosmis Iianiff and Nur 3949 which I have got in the 
accession register as G.puberula is, says Craih, 
G. rupestris 
Glycosmis, Rohinson 6452 a plant at Kcnv is G.rurestris 
says Craih and not 0.cifcrifolia 
Glycosmis Ridley 15752 is not, says Craih, as at K@w 
G.sppindoides. My interleaved Ridley has a 
15742 as G.rupestris. Is the ,, 4 H a mistake . 
Glycosmis rupestris, Craih thinks, is the true G.penta- 
phylla, hut not thepentaphylla of F. Rrit.Ind. 
Mieromelura 6708, a plant at Hew is rather M. puhescene 
than M.hirsulum (Ktoss 6708) 
Gomphia, Haniff and Nur 2074 is a, new var of this sp. 
Aglaia, G.F. 1700 is not A. glahriflora hut of the 
odorata group. K.L. may like correction. 
01ax, Rohinson 5767 is 0. sGandens not O.imbricata 
Gimlette isthe same 
Griffith 1 sMalacca plant is 0. Wight!ana and so 
is theO.merguiensis of F.Rrit.Ind. 
Microtropis, Haniff and Nur 3842, Craih think* is Jff®ot 
fi3.iformis, hut possibly peduncularis 
Microtropis Curtis 1673 differs in leaf sligl tly from 
tine plant 
Hippocratea ferruginea. Type is Curtis 175 at Calcutta 
not represented t Hew; and XXXXXJCXs descrip¬ 
tion does not quite fit XX.specimens which Redie 
has added. 
Salacia flavescens, Craih suspects it of being toohig. 
But what of S.prinoides ? 
Ampolocissus Martini Craih quotes!t as Haniff nd Nur 
4273; hut Furtado as 4274. 
Ampelocissus ^armandi, Curtis 2794 is consider^ by Crai 
as A.arachnoidea 
Leea. saxa^tilis. Ridley misquotes 8260 for 8266 
His 13351 apparently is not preserved in Singa 
pore. 
Leea Curtis 2873 from H^nkawi se ms to he saxaltills 
in Ridley’s Flora, hut wrongly. It differs. 
Mischocarpus less#rtianus, Ridley is Cupania sundaiea 
Turpinia martubanica, C aib thinks isthe true T.pomifer 
Semecarpus, Haniff and Nur 3938 is S. Curtisii at Hew, 
I cannot consult the Gardens Bulltin on this as 
the Kew copy s at the hinders and mine packed. 
