144 
THE WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY • Vol. 124, No. 1. March 2012 
the basis of host egg appearance? Journal of 
Evolutionary Biology 20:1218-1222. 
Cuthill l. C.. J. C. Partridge, A. T. D. Bennett. S. C. 
Church, N. S. Hart, and S. Hunt. 2<km). Ultraviolet 
vision in birds. Advances in the Study of Behavior 
29:159-213. 
Dale. J. 2000. Ornamental plumage does not signal male 
quality in Red-billed Queleas. Proceedings of the 
Royal Society of London, Series B 267:2143-2149. 
Dugas. M B 2009. House sparrow. Passer tlomeslicus. 
parents preferentially feed nestling with mouth colours 
that appear carotenoid-rich. Animal Behaviour 78: 
767-772. 
Dugas. M. B. 2010. Nestling birds put their best flange 
forward. Journal of Avian Biology 41:33<*~34l. 
Ellison. K„ S. G. Sealy, and H. R. McGaha. 2007. Color 
variation among nestling Brown-headed (.'owhirds 
(Molothrus aier) does not reflect differential success 
with hosts in Texas. Auk 124:526-536. 
EndleR. J. A. and M. Theky. 1996. Interacting effects of 
lek placement, display behavior, ambient light, and 
color patterns in three neotropical forest-dwelling 
birds. American Naturalist 148:421 —452. 
Ficken. M. S. 1965. Mouth color of nestling passerines and 
its use in taxonomy. Wilson Bulletin 77:71-75. 
Fraga. R. M. 1998. Interactions of the parasitic Screaming 
Cowbirds (Molothrus rufoaxillaris and M. bonaeren- 
sis) with a shared host, the Bay-winged Cowbird 
(Molothrus hadius) Pages 17.3-193 in Parasitic birds 
and their hosts studies in coevolution (S. 1. Rothstein 
and S. K. Robinson. Editors). Oxford University Press, 
New York. USA. 
Freidmann. H. 1929. The cowbirds: a study in the biology 
of social parasitism. Charles C. Thomas. Springfield, 
Illinois. USA. 
Grim. T. 2007. Experimental evidence for chick discrim¬ 
ination without recognition in a brood parasite host. 
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B 
274:373-381. 
Grim. T.. O. Kllven. and O. Mikueica. 2003. Nestling 
discrimination without recognition: a possible defence 
mechanism for hosts towards cuckoo parasitism. 
Proceedings ot the Royal Society of London. Scries 
B 270-.S73-S75. 
Hauber. M. E. and R. M. Kilner. 2007. Coevolution, 
communication, and host-chick mimicry in parasitic 
finches: who mimics whom ? Behavioural Ecology and 
Sociobiology 61:497-503. 
Honza, M.. L. Polacikova, and P. Prochazka. 2007. 
Ultraviolet and green parts of the colour sped 
affect egg rejection in the Song Thrush (Tut 
Philomelas). Biological Journal of the Linnean Soc 
92:269-276. 
Kilner, r. m. and N. B. Davies. 1998. Nestling m« 
colour: ecological correlates of a begeing" sig 
Animal Behaviour 56:705-7p 
LAN rt N - ?■ s - a»; r . M . kilniih. 2i 
™ s mx 'Jlrough I 
and the evolution of host races in Horsfield's 
Bronze-cuckoo Clutlcites basalis. F.xolution 62:1689- 
1699. 
LANGMORE. N. E.. A. COCKBURN. A. F. RliSSLlt, AND 
R. M. Kit.NEK. 2009. Flexible cuckoo chick-rejection 
rules in the Superb Fairy-wren. Behavioral Ecology 
20:978-984. 
Langmore, N. E., M. Stevens. G. Maukek, R. Heinsohn 
M. L. Hall, A. Peters, and R M. Kii.ner 2011 
Visual mimicry of host nestlings by cuckoos, Pro¬ 
ceedings of the Royal Society of London. Senes B 
278:2455-2463. 
Lichtenstein, G. 2001. Low success of Shiny Cowbird 
chicks parasitizing Rufous-bellied Thrushes: chick- 
chick competition or parental discrimination? Animal 
Behaviour 61:401-413. 
I .oisp.au. C.. S. Fellous, C. Haussy. O. Chastfe sndG 
Sor< i, 2008. Condition-dependent effects of cortico¬ 
sterone on a carotenoid-based begging signal in House 
Sparrows. Hormones and Behavior 53:266-27? 
Martin. T E. and G. R. Geupel. 1993. Nest-monitoring 
plots: methods tor locating nests and monitoring 
success. Journal of Field Ornithology 64:50“-5IR 
NICOLAI. J. 1974. Mimicry in parasitic birds. Scientific 
American 231:92-98. 
Payne, R. B. 2005. Nestling mouth markings and colors ol 
Old World finches Estrildidae: mimicry and coevn- 
luiion of nesting finches and their Vidua brood 
parasites. Miscellaneous Publication Number 194 
Museum of Zoology. University of Michigan. Ann 
Arbor, USA. 
Ralph, C. j.. G. R. Geupel. P. Pyle. T. E. Martin, and 
D. S. DESANTE. 1993. Handbook of field methods for 
monitoring landbirds. USDA, Forest Service, General 
Technical Report PSW-GTR 144. Pacific Southwest 
Research Station. Albany. California. USA. 
Redondo, r. 1993. Exploitation ot hosi mechanisms for 
parental care by avian brood parasites. Etologia 
235-297. 
Rothstein. S. I. 1978. Geographical variation in nesting 
coloration of parasitic cowbirds. Auk 95:152-160. 
Saino. N.. R. Ambrosini. R. Marttnelli, P Nlnni. a'- : 
A. P. Moller. 2003. Gape coloration reliably reflecis 
immunocompetence of Bam Swallow (Hiruiulo rus- 
tica) nestlings. Behavioral Ecology 14:16-22. 
Saino. N„ P. Ninni, S. Calza. R. Martinb.u. Y * 
Bernardi. and A. P. Moller. 2(KJ0. Belter red tl'an 
dead: carotenoids-based mouth colouration re-sir 
infection in Bam Swallow nestling'. Proceeding' 1 
the Royal Society of London. Senes B 267:57-61 
Sato. N J.. K. Tokue. R. A. Noske. O. K Mikami.and k 
USDA. 2010. Evicting cuckoo nestlings from the 
new anti-parasitism behaviour. Biology Letter' 6:6 - r 
Schultz, J. G. 2005a. Low survival of parasitic chicks may 
result from their imperfect adaptation to hosts raihu 
than expression of defenses against parasitism- 
lution 59:2017-2024. 
Schultz. J. G. 2005b. Reduced growth but noi survival o 
Chicks with altered gape patterns: implications for' ' 
evolution of nestling similarity in a parasitic fin' n 
Animal Behaviour 70:839-848. 
