Belinsky et al. • ACOUSTIC COMPETITION IN VEERIES 
269 
LITERATURE CITED 
Ball. M. 2000. Vocal behavior of Bicknell's Thrush 
(Cathurus bicknelli). Thesis. Dalhousic University. 
Halifax. Nova Scotia. Canada. 
BtE- M. A. AND C. MlCHHYL. 2008. The cocktail party 
problem: what is it? How can it be solved .’ And why 
should animal behaviorists study it.’ Journal ol 
Comparative Psychology 122:235-251. 
Belanger, A. J.. I. Bobeica. and D. M. Higgs. 2010. I he 
effect of stimulus type and background noise on heat ing 
abilities of the round goby Neugohius tnelunostomus. 
Journal of Fish Biology 77:1488— 1504. 
Borror. D. 1964. Songs of thrushes (Turdidae). wrens 
(Troglodytidae). and mockingbirds. Ohio Journal ol 
Science 64:195-207. 
Bradbiry. J. W. .and S. L. VEHRENCAMP. 1998. Principles 
ol animal communication. Sitmuer. Sunderland. Mas¬ 
sachusetts. USA. 
Bri mm. H. 2006. Signaling through acoustic windows: 
nightingales avoid interspecific competition by short¬ 
term adjustment of song liming. Journal of Compar¬ 
ative Physiology. A: Neuroethology Sensory Neural 
and Behavioral Physiology 192:1279 12X5. 
Brumm. H. and M. Naguib. 2009. Environmental 
acoustics and the evolution of bird song, Advances 
in the Study of Behavior 40:1-33. 
Brumm. H. and P. J. B. Slater. 2006. Ambient noise, 
motor fatigue, and serial redundancy in chaffinch 
song. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 60:475- 
481. 
Catchpoll C. K. and P. J. B. Slater. 2008. Bird song: 
biological themes and variations. Cambridge Univer¬ 
sity Press, Cambridge. United Kingdom. 
Dent. M. 1... E. M. McClaine, V. Best. E. Ozmeral. R. 
Narayan. F. J. Gallon. K. Sln, and B. G. Siiinn- 
Cunningham. 2009. Spatial unmasking ot birdsong in 
Zebra Finches [Taeniupygia guttata) and Budgerigars 
(Melopxiitacus undulutus). Journal ol Comparative 
Psychology 123:357-367. 
Dlt.GirR. W. 1956. Hostile behavior and reproductive 
isolating mechanisms in the avian genera ( at hams 
and Hylocichla. Auk 73:313-353. 
Fu kin. r. w„ M. S. Fickf.n. and J. P. Hail man. 1974. 
Temporal pattern shifts to avoid acoustic interference 
in singing birds. Science 183:762-763. 
Kump, G. M. 1996. Bird communication in the noisy 
world. Pages 321-338 in Ecology and evolution of 
acoustic communication in birds < D. E. Kroodsmu and 
E H. Miller. Editors). Cornell University Press. Ithaca. 
New York. USA. 
Knapion. R. \V. 1987. Intraspecific avoidance and 
interspecific overlap of song series in the Eastern 
Meadowlark. Auk 104:775-779. 
Naguib, M. and D. J. Mlnnii i - 2010. The signal value ol 
birdsong; empirical evidence suggests song overlap¬ 
ping is a signal. Animal Behaviour 80:11-15. 
NaUgi.er. C. T. and L. Ratuliffe. 1994. Character release 
in bird song-a test of the acoustic competition 
hypothesis using American Tree Sparrows. Journal ol 
Avian Biology 25:142—148. 
Patricf.lli, G. L. and J. L. Buckley. 2006. Avian 
communication in urban noise: causes and conse¬ 
quences of vocal adjustment. Auk 123:639-649. 
Pi anqu£, R. and H. Si.ABiSEKOORN. 2008. Spectral overlap 
in songs and temporal avoidance in a Peruvian bird 
assemblage. Ethology I 14:262-271. 
POFSEL, A.. T. DABELSTEEN. AND S. B. PEDERSEN. 2007. 
Implications of conspeeific background noise for 
features of Blue Tit, Cyanistrs caentleus, communi¬ 
cation networks at dawn. Journal ot Ornithology 
148:123-128. 
Pom. N. U.. H. SlahbfkooRN. G. M. KLUMP. and U. 
1.ANGEMANN. 2009 Effects of signal features and 
environmental noise oil signal detection in the Great 
Til. Purus major. Animal Behaviour 78:1293-1300. 
Popp, J. W.. R. W. Fickf.n. AND J. A. Reln’ARTZ. 1985. 
Short-term tempoal avoidance of interspecific acoustic 
iuterferenee among (VeAl birds. Auk 102 744-748. 
RICHARDSON, C. AND T UNGAGNE. 2010. Multiple signals 
and male spacing affect female preference at cocktail 
parties in treetrogs. Proceedings of the Royal Society 
of London. Series B 277:1247-1252. 
Rivers. J. W. and D. E. Kroodsma. 2000. Singing 
behavior of the Hermit Thrush. Journal of Field 
Ornithology 71:467—171. 
Samarra, F. I. P.. K. Ki.aiw.rt. H. Brumm. and P. J. O. 
Miller. 2009. Background noise constrains commu¬ 
nication: acoustic masking of courtship song in the 
fruit fly Drosophila mantana. Behaviour 146:1635- 
1648. . 
Samuel, D. 1972, Song variation and other vocalizations ot 
Veeries. Bild-Banding 43:118-127. 
SAS Institute Inc. 2004. SAS software. JMP 5.0. SAS 
Institute Inc., Cary. North Carolina. USA. 
Si ABBEKOORN. H. 2004. Singing in the wild: die ecology of 
birdsong. Pages 178-205 in Nature's music: the 
science of birdsoug (P- Marler and H. Slabbekoom, 
Editors). Elsevier Academic Press. San Diego, Cali¬ 
fornia. USA. 
Si ABBEKOORN. H. AND M. Peet. 2003. Ecology: birds sing 
at a higher pitch in urban noise- Great Tits hit the high 
notes to ensure that then mating calls are heard above 
ihe city’s din. Nature 424:267-267. 
Si AGSVOLD, T- 1996. Dawn and dusk singing of male 
American Robins in relation to female behavior. 
Wilson Bulletin 108:507-515. 
Staicer. C. A.. D. A. Spector. and A. G. I lORN. 1996. The 
dawn chorus and other diel patterns in acoustic 
signaling. Pages 426 453 in Ecology and evolution 
of acoustic communication in birds (D. E. Kroodsma 
and E. H. Miller. Editors). Cornell University Press. 
Ithaca, New York. USA. 
Warren. P. S.. M. Katd. M. Ekmann. and A. Brazel. 
2006. Urban bioacoustics: it's not jusi noise. Animal 
Behaviour 71:491—502. 
Weary. D. M„ R E. Lemon, and E. M. Date. 1986. 
Acoustic features used in song discrimination by the 
Veery. Ethology 72:199-213. 
Wiley, R- H. 2006. Signal detection and animal commu¬ 
nication. Advances in ihe Study' of Behav ior 36:217- 
247. 
