Jones and While • NEST SURVIVAL OF SPRAGUE'S PIPIT 
315 
from diverse locations should present a more 
complete picture of the natural history and habitat 
requirements of this unique grassland species. 
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 
This project was funded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service.NongameMigratory Bird Program. Region 6. M. J. 
Aitmann measured and mapped the nest data using GIS. J. 
S. [>ieni. V D. Niemuth, S. K. Davis. L. D. Igl, and two 
anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on earlier 
versions of this manuscript. Mention of trade or product 
names does not indicate endorsement; the findings and 
conclusions in this article are those of the authorls) and do 
not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service. 
LITERATURE CITED 
Agresti. A. 2007. An introduction to categorical data 
analysis. Second Edition. John Wiley and Sons. New 
York. USA. 
Burnham. K. P. and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model 
selection and multimodel inference: a practical infor¬ 
mation-theoretic approach. Second Edition. Springer- 
Verlag, New York. USA. 
Committee on the Status of Endangered Wieih iff in 
Canada (COSEWIC). 2002. COSKWIC assessment 
and update status report on the Sprague's Pipit Anthus 
spragueii in Canada. Environment Canada. ('anadian 
Wildlife Service, Ottawa. Ontario, Canada. 
Dale. B. C„ T. S. Wiens, and L E. Hamilton. 2009. 
Abundance of three grassland songbirds in an area of 
natural gas infill drilling in Alberta, Canada. Pages 
194-204 in Proceedings of the 4th International 
Banners in Flight Conference. 13 Hi February 2008 
(T. D. Rich, C. Arizmcndi, D. W. Demurest, and C. 
Thompson. Editors). McAllen, Texas. USA. 
Davis. S. K. 2003. Nesting ecology of mixed-grass prairie 
songbirds in southern Saskatchewan. Wilson Bulletin 
115:119-130. 
Davis, S. K. 2004. Area sensitivity in grassland passerines: 
effects of patch size, patch shape, and vegetation 
structure on bird abundance and occurrence in 
southern Saskatchewan. Auk 121:1130-1145. 
Davis, s. K. R. M. Bingham. T. L. Shaffer, and P. C. 
James, 2006. Mixed-grass prairie passerines exhibit weak 
aad variable responses to patch size. Auk 123:807-821. 
Dwsmore. S. J.. g. C. White, and F. L Knopf. 2002. 
Advanced techniques for modeling avian nest survival. 
Ecology 83:3476-3488. 
Environment Canada. 2008. Recovery strategy for the 
Sprague's Pipit (Antlins spragueii) in Canada. Species 
at Risk Act recovery strategy series. Environment 
Canada. Ottawa, Ontario. Canada. 
Environment A1 systems Research Institute (ESR1). 
2007. Arc Info and ArcMap GIS software. Environ¬ 
mental Systems Research Institute. Redlands, Califor¬ 
nia, USA. 
Fahrig, L. and T. Rytwinski. 2009. Effects of roads on animal 
abundance: an empirical review and synthesis. Ecology 
and Society 14:21. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/ 
vol 14/iss I /art21 / 
Johnson, D. L. and L. D. Igl. 2003. Area requirements of 
grassland birds: a regional perspective. Auk 118:24-34. 
Johnson. R. G. and S. A. Temple. 1990. Nest predation 
and brood parasitism of lallgrass prairie birds. Journal 
of Wildlife Management 54:106-11 I 
JONES. S. L. 2010. Sprague's Pipit (Anthus spragueii) 
conservation plan. USDl, Fish and Wildlife Service. 
Nongame Migratory Birds Coordinator's Office, Denver, 
Colorado. USA. http://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/ 
s|iecics/bials/spraguf'pipit/SpraguesJS2010r4.pdf 
JONES, S. L. and J. S. DlFM. 2007. The relationship 
between predation and nest concealment in mixed- 
grass prairie passerines: an analysis using Program 
MARK. Studies in Avian Biology 34:117-123. 
Jones, S. L.. J S. DffiNt. and P. J. Gouse. 2010. 
Reproductive biology of a grassland songbird com¬ 
munity in north-central Montana. Wilson Journal of 
Ornithology 122:455-464. 
Koper, N. and F. K A, SCHMIEGELOW. 2006. A multi¬ 
scaled analysis of avian response to habitat amount 
and fragmentation in the Canadian dry mixed-grass 
prairie. Landscape Ecology 21:1045-1059. 
Koper. N„ D. J. Walker, and J. Champagne. 2009. 
Nonlinear effects of distance to habitat edge on 
Sprague’s Pipits in southern Alberta, Canada. Land¬ 
scape Ecology 24:1287-1297 
LAHTI, D. C. 2001. The “edge effect on nest predation" 
hypothesis after twenty years. Biological Conservation 
99:365-374. 
Martin, T. E. 1993. Nest predation among vegetation layers 
and habitat types: revising the dogmas. American 
Naturalist 141:897-913. 
Martin, T. E. and G, R. Gkvjpel. 1993. Nest-monitoring 
plots: methods for locating nests and monitoring 
success. Journal of Field Ornithology 64:507-519. 
ROTELLA, J. J.. S. J. DlNSMORE. AND T. L. SHAFFER. 2004. 
Modeling nest-survival data: a comparison of recently 
developed methods that can be implemented in MARK 
and SAS. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 
27:187-205. 
Sutter, G. C.. S. K. Davis, and D. C. Duncan. 2000. 
Grassland songbird abundance along roads and trails 
in southern Saskatchewan. Journal of Field Ornithol¬ 
ogy 71:110-116. 
U.S. Department of Interior t USDI), 2010. Endangered 
and threatened wildlife and plants; 12-month finding on a 
petition to list Sprague’s Pipit as endangered or 
threatened throughout its range. Federal Register 75:178. 
Vickery, P. D.. M. L. Hitter, and I. V. Wells Jr. 1992. 
Evidence of incidental nest predation and its effects on 
nests of threatened grassland birds. Oikos 63:281-288. 
White, G. C. and K. P Burnham. 1999. Program MARK: 
survival estimation from populations of marked 
animals. Bird Study 46 (Supplement!: 120-139. 
