Thompson et al • LANDSCAPE EFFECTS ON CERULEAN WARBLER ABUNDANCE 727 
Hamel, P. B„ D. K. Dawson, and P. D. Keyser. 2004. 
How we can learn more about the Cerulean Warbler 
(Dendroica cerulea). Auk 121:7-14. 
Hamel. P. B.. M. Staten, and R. Wishard. 2006. Initial 
Cerulean Warbler (Dendroica cerulea) response to 
experimental silvicultural manipulations, Desha Co.. 
Arkansas. Pages 4-9 in Proceedings of the 13th 
Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference 
iK. F. Connor. Editor i, USDA, Forest Service. General 
Technical Report SRS-92 Southern Research Station, 
Asheville. North Carolina. USA. 
Hartman. P. J„ D. S. Maehr. and J. L. Larkin. 2009. 
Habitat selection of Cerulean Warblers in eastern 
Kentucky. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 121:469—475. 
Hu DEN, O. 1965, Habitat selection in birds. Annalcs 
Zoologici Fenniei 2:53-75. 
Howell. C. A. S. C. LaTta. T. M. Donovan. P. A. 
Porneluzi, G. R. Parks, and J. Faaboro. 2000. 
Landscape effects mediate breeding bird abundance in 
Midwestern forests. Landscape Ecology 15:547-562. 
Jacobs. B. and J. A. Wilson. 1997. Missouri breeding binl 
atlas 1986-1992. Missouri Department of Conserva¬ 
tion. Jefferson City. USA. 
Joe. H. and R. Zhu. 2005. Generalized Poisson distribu¬ 
tion: the property of mixture of Poisson and compar¬ 
ison with negative binomial distribution. Biometrical 
Journal 47:219-229, 
Johnson, D. H. 2008. In defense of indices: the case of bird 
surveys. Journal of Wildlife Management 72:857-868. 
Jones, J. and R. J. Robertson. 2001. Territory and nest- 
site selection of Cerulean Warblers in eastern Ontario. 
Auk 118:727-735. 
Uchstein, J. W.. T. R. Simons, and K E. Fkan/kiu. 2002. 
Landscape effects on breeding songbird abundance in 
managed forests. Ecological Applications 12:836-857. 
Lloyd. P„ T. E. Martin, R. l. Redmond. U. Langnlr, 
and M. M. HART. 2005. Linking demographic effects 
of habitat fragmentation across landscapes to conti¬ 
nental source-sink dynamics. Ecological Applications 
15:1504-1514. 
McGarjgal, K and W. C. McComB. 1995. Relationships 
between landscape structure anti breeding birds in the 
Oregon Coast Range. Ecological Monographs 65:215- 
260. 
-Moldenhauer, R. R and D j. Keg els kj. 1996. Northern 
Parula (Panda anwricana). The birds of North 
America. Number 215. 
Newell. F. L. and a. D. Rodkwald. 2011. Role of 
topography, canopy structure, and tlorislics in nest-site 
selection and nesting success of canopy songbirds. 
Forest Ecology and Management 262:739-749. 
Newell, F. L. and A. D. Rodewald. 2012. Management 
for oak regeneration: short-term effects on the bird 
community and suitability of shelterwood harvests tor 
canopy songbirds. Journal of Wildlife Management 
76:683-693. 
Oliarnyk, C. J. and R. J. Robertson. 1996. Breeding 
behavior and reproductive success of Cerulean War¬ 
blers in southeastern Ontario. Wilson Bulletin 108: 
673-684. 
Reidy. J. I.., F. R. Thompson ITT, and W. Bailey. 2011. 
Comparison of methods for estimating density of 
forest songbirds from point counts. Journal of Wildlife 
Management 75:558-568. 
Robbins, M. B.. B. R. Barber, and K. Zyskowski. 1998. 
Census of Cerulean Warblers along the upper Current 
River, with comments on the status of other riparian 
species. Bluebird 65:10-16. 
Robbins, M. B.. a. S. NVari, M. Papes. B. W. Benzi. and 
B. R. BARBER. 2010. River-based surveys for assessing 
riparian bird populations: Cerulean Warbler as a test 
case. Southeastern Naturalist 9:95-104. 
Robinson, S. K.. F. R. Thompson in. T. M. Donovan. 
D. R. White head, and J. Faaboro. 1995. Regional 
forest fragmentation and die nesting success of 
migratory birds. Science 267:1987-1990. 
Rodewald. A. D. and K. 11. Yahner. 2000. Bird 
communities associated with harvested hardwood 
stands containing residual trees. Journal of Wildlife 
Management 64:924-932. 
Rosenstock. S. S'., D. R. Anderson. K. M. Giesen, T. 
Leukering, and M. F. Carter. 2002. Landbird 
counting techniques: current practices and an alterna¬ 
tive. Auk 119:46-53. 
ROTH. K. L. and K. Islam. 2008. Habitat selection and 
reproductive success of Cerulean Warblers in Indiana. 
Wilson Journal of Ornithology 120:105-110. 
Sauer. J. R., B. G. Pltekjohn, and W. A. Link. 1994. 
Observer differences in the North American Breeding 
Bird Survey. Auk 111:50-62. 
Sauer, J. R.. J. E. Hines. J. E. Fallon, K L Pardieck, 
D. J. Ziolkowski Jr., and W. A. Link, 201 I. The 
North American Breeding Bird Survey, results and 
analysis 1966-2010. Version 12.07.2011. USGS, 
Patuxent Wildlife Research Center. Laurel, Maryland, 
USA. www.pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/results 
Thogmartin. W. E.. J. R. Sauer, and M. G. Knutson. 
2004. A hierarchical spatial model of avian abundance 
with application to Cerulean Warblers. Ecological 
Applications 14:1766-1779. 
Thompson III. F. R.. T. M. Donovan, R. M. DeGraaf, J. 
Faaboro, and S. K. Robinson. 2002, A multi-scale 
perspective of the effects of forest fragmentation on birds 
in eastern forests, Studies in Avian Biology 25:8-19. 
Wt.AKLAND, C. A. AND P. B. Wood. 2005 Cerulean 
Warbler (Dendroica cerulea ) microhabityt and land¬ 
scape-level habitat characteristics in southern West 
Virginia. Auk 122:497-508. 
Wood. P. B.. S. B. Bosworth, and R. Dettmers. 2(X)6. 
Cerulean Warbler abundance and occurrence relative 
to large-scale edge and habitat characteristics. Condor 
108:154-165. 
