61 
30. Fletcher, James. —Rep. Out. Ent. Soc., 1889, pp. 95-100. 
A general review of the history of the flour moth in Canada. 
31. Riley, C. V., & Howard, L. O.—Insect Life, Jan.-Feb., 
1890, v. 2, p. 260. 
Mention of the rearing of Chremylus rubiginosus from Ephestia 
kuehniella. 
32. Ormerod, E. A.—Thirteenth Rep. Inj. Ins., 1889, pp. 49-54. 
A partial review of matter in her Twelfth Report concerning 
the flour moth, with many other notes upon it. 
33. Bryce, P. H.—App. Bull. I., Provincial Bd. Health, Ont. 
Oct. 15, 1890. 
A circular letter urging millers and dealers to take active steps 
to eradicate the flour moth. 
34. Patton, W. H.—Insect Life, Nov. 1890, v. 3, pp. 158, 159. 
Under caption “Notes upon Ephestia interpunctella (Htibn) 
Zeller,” both E. kuehniella and Tinea zeoe are listed as synonyms 
of E. interpunctella. 
35. Riley, C. V., & Howard, L. O.—Insect Life, Nov. 1890, v. 3, 
p. 134. 
Dissent from Patton’s views (See No. 31) believing Ephestia 
kuehniella to be a distinct species. 
1891. 
36. Hulst, G. D.—Trans. Am. Ent. Soc., 1890, v. 17, pp. 198-200. 
Some notes on Ephestia kuehniella in monograph of North 
American Phycitidse. 
37. Fletcher, James. —Rep. Minister Agr. [Ottawa], 1890, App., 
pp. 168-171. 
General summary concerning the Canadian outbreak, 
38. Ormerod, E. A.—Fourteenth Rep. Inj. Ins., 1890, pp. 49-54. 
A general review of the English outbreak, for the year 1890, 
with much additional information on the subject. 
39. Riley, C. V., & Howard, L. O. —Insect Life, Apr. 1891, v. 3, 
p. 333. 
Mention of: a sp3cies of Ephestia (either kuehniella or inter¬ 
punctella) in corn from Venezuela. 
1892. 
*40. Cockerell, T. D. A.—Daily Gleaner, Aug. 11, 1892; Tri- 
Weekly Budget, Aug. 11, 1892; Jamaica Post, Aug. 13,1892. 
Reprint by the above Jamaica newspapers of a circular letter 
announcing the appearance in Jamaica of what was at first sup¬ 
posed to be the flour moth, but which proved to be Ephestia 
desuetella. 
