62 
*41. Decaux, C.—Arch, de Med. et de Pharm. Militaire (France,) 
No. 8, 1892. 
Notes and record of experiments with Ephestia lcuehniella. 
*42.-Ann. Soc. Ent. France, v. G2 (Bull.), pp. ccii, cciii. 
A communication concerning Ephestia lcuehniella to the Congr6s 
des SociStds Savantes , notice of which is published in the Annales 
above cited. • 
*43. - Ann. Soc. Ent. France, v. G2 (Bull.), pp. ccii, cciii. 
A communication to the AcadSmie des Sciences (France), con¬ 
cerning Ephestia lcuehniella , referred to in the above Annales. 
44. Biley, C. V., & Howard, L. O.—Insect Life, Nov. 1892, v. 5, 
p. 141. 
Deference to the appearance of Ephestia lcuehniella in Jamaica 
(erroneously reported; see No. 40) and in flouring-mills in San 
Francisco, Cal. 
45. Adkin, R.—The Entomologist, 1892, v. 25, pp. 53, 51. 
A short article on the English outbreak, and original notes. 
46. Johnson, W. G. —Sacramento Record Union, Dec. 5, 1892; 
Santa Cruz Surf, Dec. 5, 1892; Los Angeles Times, Dec. 
5, 1892; Santa Barbara Morning Press, Dec. 8, 1892. 
Am “emergency circular” (for copy see p. 33.) reprinted in the 
California newspapers. 
47. - San Francisco Call, Dec. 6, 1892. 
Matter furnished a reporter in an interview concerning Epjliestia 
lcuehniella. 
48. - Stockton [Cal.] Mail, Dec. 12, 1892. 
A short account of the flour moth with reference to its occur¬ 
rence in California. 
49. Ragonot, E. L.—Ann. Soc. Ent. France (Bull.) Dec. 28. 
1892, p. cclxxiv. 
Remarks on the origin of Ephestia lcuehniella and on its 
zoological position. 
1893. 
50. Johnson, W. G.—Milling (Indianapolis, Ind.) Jan., 1893, v. 
2. pp. 177-180; reprinted in American Miller (Chicago) 
Feb., 1893, v. 21, p. 119. 
Brief summary of past history, and notes on the California out¬ 
break. 
51. Decaux, F.—Ann. Soc. Ent. France (Bull.) 1893, p. xii. 
Remarks upon the distribution of Ephestia lcuehniella and upon, 
the experimental work of Dr. C. Decaux. 
