620 
VETERINARY JURISPRUDENCE. 
A Few Plain Words about Horses. By R. H. Dyer, 
M.R.C.V.S., &c., Waterford. 
This is a very small pamphlet, written by Mr. Dyer for 
gratuitous circulation, a copy of which may be obtained by 
forwarding a stamped and directed envelope to him. 
Here, again, we have to commend a member of the pro¬ 
fession, to the negation of self, aiding in the diffusion of 
right principles and thus contributing to the general weal 
of the community, by inducing those to think who have to 
do with the noblest and one of the most valuable animals 
in creation—the horse. The necessity for the inhalation of 
pure air, proper clothing, diet, exercise, and rest, are insisted 
upon by Mr. Dyer for the maintenance of health. 
Then follow a few words on feeding, shoeing, and the 
examination of horses as to soundness. It is an unpre¬ 
tending brochure of twenty-four very small pages, and closes 
with the following statement, that Cf if a perusal of these 
pages tend to inform the tyro, assist the uninformed, and 
prevent unpleasant results to the accomplished in horse 
matters, the labour of the writer will be amply repaid.” 
Veterinary Jurisprudence. 
DONCASTER COUNTY COURT.— September 5th. 
(Before R. Wildman, Esq., Judge.) 
BREACH OF WARRANTY OF A HORSE. 
{Special Jury.') 
SEPTIMUS EDWARD TURNER V. ROBERT ROEBUCK. 
The following gentlemen were sworn upon the jury :—Mr. Godfrey 
Addey, Mr. Geo. D. Thorpe, Mr. James Foster, Mr. W. T. Bennitt, and 
Mr. Thomas Geldert. 
Mr. Whitfield, of Rotherham, was for the plaintiff, and Mr. Smith for 
the defendant. 
The facts of this case, as adduced by Mr. Whitfield, were as follows : 
—Mr. Turner, the plaintiff, is a veterinary surgeon living at Tickhill, 
and the defendant (Mr. Roebuck) is a butcher and farmer, residing at 
Wadworth. The present action was brought to recover £23 J9s. for 
