108 
EDITORIAL OBSERVATIONS. 
of the animus which pervades the whole of the trans¬ 
action : 
“MARLBOROUGH STREET. 
“Important to Owners of Horses. 
“Mr. Dollar, veterinary surgeon, of Bulstrode Mews, entered the 
court and addressed the sitting magistrate under the following circum¬ 
stances : 
“ Mr. Dollar said his Worship might remember, that on the 25th of 
September last, a summons was determined by him against Mrs. 
Liverson, of the Horseferry Road, for suffering to be used a certain 
horse alleged to be glandered, and that he attended professionally for 
the defendant, and gave evidence that in his opinion the horse was not 
glandered, against the opinion entertained by Mr. Cherry, the police 
veterinary surgeon, who gave evidence on the other side. His Worship 
might also remember that, as they were professionally at variance on the 
point, he despatched an officer named Browning with the horse to the 
Royal Veterinary College, Camden Town ; and that he brought back with 
him a certificate from one of the professors (Varnell) to the effect that 
the horse was glandered ; upon which he inflicted a fine of 40s. on the 
defendant. Since then he had treated the horse as for a cold, and, it 
having been cured, it was again sent to the Veterinary College in a 
baker’s cart, and a certificate given which, although mentioning several 
faults, said not a word about its having been glandered, and stated it 
to be sound. 
“ Mr. Bingham said there was no case before him, and therefore he 
could not reopen the subject; and that if he (Mr. Dollar) felt his reputa¬ 
tion had suffered, he must make his application elsewhere. 
“ Mr. Dollar said he only unshed to vindicate the professional opinion 
he gave at the trial, and which he had certificates from other surgeons to 
prove was correct. 
“The applicant then left the court/’ 
We may here safely leave the matter; but as our legal 
administrators have likewise at this very time been engaged 
in a suit arising out of the sale of some glandered horses, we 
append a report of the trial as published in the Times. 
“COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Westminster, Jan. 22. 
“(Sittings at Nisi Prius , at Westminster, before Mr. Justice Byles 
and a Common Jury.) 
“ RUSSEN V. WILLIAMSON. 
“Mr. Serjeant Tozer and Mr. F. Russell appeared for the plaintiff; 
