.15 
1862.] Vestiges of Three Royal Lines of Kanyahubja, Sfc. 
Tj^^renTr^icn vx wx- 
wtuiu *r^xx:xstxfi«ixjxu3Tw^i xjwrtn^xxjwTcf: ^tn^l- 
’frsnT^Juxctra 1 xRwtf^wiiT T?:x*[xf[?rrw5;tw^i v^r- 
^TffiKT'irsgTcf: ^w^iUK^tracqg: xr^r uxrw?ftwHii ixfxvxar- 
>J 
v^’acnx^ujxamr xq^vnnfe^x^urctrr- 
Tix: wnxTcftwIsT fr^TXT3rxf)jrt^Tn^f xx^xsmrrin^xzrra: 
j ~j 
^f^TTJTT^ITHcqsD Xf^iT^OTj^T *TT- 
\J 
tfX *^ftH"i'^TTT i 3a^nr^^?qT^X^xaTcI: ’sftHTt^tt^THcxrar: 
VTWXfk^UXP TrTXXT^^ftf^TX^xn^tt^: HpCSTWllTf ^T- 
x:i3n^f^gxj^^^^i?xlxfxxxr5i^xifctxr^fe^ifcqTmT« «jhjxx- 
nJ 
cIX*t XXfX^araf^XFfiXXT BfcT^Tftril^ilT^TTIXTfcr I 
v, si s 
^gfcf%ftsmxxx*ni ^tirw^ ^nxesrcfif^fcra^' xr'I^ti^sf- 
0\ 
tx<xt ftr^i: v^xfi-x^ir §^fsi«irx^ || 
Bsr^mf?:w?«@x ! xixxr xrert JXfrgx *axm xrfxixnljn Bfcnxxf^ci 
Tfcr W^r vrt^ afasnfafu^xqrgi^jBfggih 
wWrfT *nfrex ^TUHtu rfci | 
C\ *•'£ ^ 
^'rfxiw gv?fi«T ixx^xxr^ f^^x^cr: | 
Si 1 
* * # 5nrft i * i 
Satjgob, October 5, 1861. 
* Instead of this, the former decipherment has ^^PrqT- 
1 Not -VWT^T as was a ^ first read. 
s» 
1 Here I have converted a sibilant into a visarga. 
§ Of the gotra of Darbhin mention is frequent. For Darbhya, see the In- 
dische Studien , Yol. I , pp. 209, 255 ; and Vol. II., pp. 308, 309 : for Darbhya, 
Professor Max Muller’s History of Ancient Sanslcrit Literature , first edition, p. 
283: atid, for Darbha, Professor Weber’s Catalogue of the Berlin Sanskrit 
Manuscripts, p. 56, line 7. 
|| Here is an error, but of easy correction. There should have been, of course, 
^fVkjir3T*m*HU. 
The original has, by mistake, -f^fsjo, 
* Amended from Then follow two unrecognized numerals, deno¬ 
ting a dynastic year, and an indistinct compound character of unknown signifi¬ 
cance. Further on, the day of the semi-lunation is expressed by a single 
numeral. It is the same as the first of the two just spoken of. 
•VV>/ v»WVN/ VX/WWV/WVW^/WN/VV/'/V/WW 
wwv 
/ 
