1SG3.] 
117 
Three Sanskrit Inscriptions. 
C\ S 3 
"ETfiTr * * * § r-.* n y u 
B f%JTrW 7"S[ ^’Srf^yrn^cr TjUTTOfft JWT | 
tTef HTfUfflfH: II < || 
cr^T 
TXXf f^Wf j'^ 5 U«T: I 
II *> II 
feNro^ snr*r 
j C\ 't "' 
w* I 
ii <= ii 
r^irat fsr^fcf "5r^*mrfeu^?ft i 
n^. wi f ?;ci^: tm§ fii?'ifjr*iH gfcmtfcr *rtfn:|i£j 
WT*ficWfani£sm»g^n ftiicfT% 
sj ^nr$«r | 
filKftr ff’srjonm 
ttPrew^tfai vm JUT’ti'ti: n \® n 
htr gmir^s^fanrsi^Str 
btv ftfftiw | 
'^i S • 
WHrTC%: ?J§ ^fWr^fcT =r: || ^ || 
*%tb,' ym ^i^rer ^f^rar- 
w^^ju ftfrtsTH i 
V* ^RcfffcT 
^w^rftr ^ncr^^^ix^: 11 ii 
^WafltlT ^if^f'TT W^T-|| 
* In the old decipherment, ^XS 
f Formerly misread “ his own city.” In the next line, there was 
also an error: lor 7f;q. 
X Not, according to the old reading, «iK%. 
§ In place of the of my predecessor. 
|! It has not been proved, that the Hindus of old times applied the term 
