J 20 
Three Sanskrit Inscriptions. [No. 2, 
fRaunrct^TJS'Wv xnrr$ 3u* * * § rgfer vnRfcr smraurefer r i 
vrt VRefj *r<t t3= R)«f¥rRif <rrt *r- 
*XRT faftRs rtri ^ft»rec?TVR rjtsej^ wicnfiRRiiiR^ 
xrng'tirrfH^uif ^t^RTr^Rr RRRrvttim r^rIhur^- 
^VRIcrf^’J'^: *RRRR: RSpSI^R: ^ilRTTW- r^rjst^tc: 
rttarv- ^ftjrngir^r: ^rsn'fRRxh «RRr«TfjRiRRs®r- 
f*RtffcT:t ****** ggfin^cT 
xniRfimfiir JTRRtrg fqmRR^viRtRiRR 'sr&j'XRTfestr- 
^RTfeRflf^R: ReRTfSR: RV]HTRR^WraTfa^f5R ! TtRT- 
R RRX0TIRR §WR^R^R3RRRRTJRRjfcrTR!a*r- 
vr w^nreif^ vfrRRfsRRSRVRR vfecU5Tt^;r'u?T- 
•^ir ^fofcjRtfwmr^R trfecTRlRtcatRm sRunRi^xR- 
C, J C\ 
^i«sr V[*Rt®Rl,yf?R«R‘tRT HT®RtJT?;TRRV^T XRrT: II 
>J 
**R RTJ^TSRT ^TgVRfcT VRT | 
*RRcfR VTXfRRt VTfcR^R 
w5l VRI viv^ KTflVR: I 
C\ CS 
rri%r xRtg^Tfmr 
*fiTR ^n% RTRRjRT WVfg: II = 0 || 
V3?f*PfOTT VlffiT VTRfw: RJRlftfW: | 
vj 
<RT V<0 WfxRt^I eRf eRT tfR« || || 
jRirrri^ jrr«m WflXRRJTfRm | 
0 >.. "- 
f *R v *R3RIVTf«T RWPnWcreRiRJT II ^.i. II 
xrutrt ^avaRsr r i 
1TRT wfrrscfr ?f g-sgfir || 3 » |) 
C\ ’ 
* Formerly altered to and printed oSffivT^TT*nT , g^T^to'3\T. 
t So, as I conjectured when I had not yet, set eyes on the copper-plate of this 
grant, we should read, instead of the printed ’sfVsrfsfiq^j. Here is the second 
mention of Tripun in this memorial. ^ 
X The next six syllables are quite effaced. From this point to there is 
a blank in the old decipherment. My own reading yields little meaning; but 
the words are, evidently, unfamiliar technicalities. The receipts styled dushta- 
sddhij&daya must have had to do with the du -sh ta-sddhy a - charddhy alcsh a, who lia3 
already been spoken of, 
§ ^ h ave changed to 
