1862.] 
Three Sanskrit Inscriptions. 
125 
Inscription III. 
fsmm i 
^rVci mi tixraift ^ *im | ttt Tm^wCr^^KT- 
TTHmTTT^fm:TfTHWTrcTmfT*:ra'tr?:wT?:VTH?{TT I s- 
v^^grexn^t^^mfTsrw^i* ?i wtgvvnvrlfaflTmiar • 
■sHtthtC 5w^rHt;tsrmT?:r^ vftvsf^rafsf'ft 
TTT ETWafTT^ OrgmcJT^'mNcI^fvrTT-'^^TfTrJTfT^T^^mB- 
THVimwMi ^jtt ir^r bwjbt f^fS^TS^i^nirxr- 
v» ^ • * -J s» ^ 
am tuttitt! ufeTT^ vcfl*nf«i« w*r 'smw.fNw- 
srrfXTTfw wfrTTcjmiir TTTTT^t^T^t'WTTrcHTm- 
^fg ! ^fs;vTT swsf^rm- 
turcr$ Tg^mTTJTfcrcf T*TT«miTfl || Tre?r^ n^Ttw i 
^iraiert ^tut wttri ^rrcum gfcsT- 
C\ 
xtf^ir^t ^TTtum gxr^m ’smn^Turmmr ft 
Tg^ysf^TwA | 
=3X5TT | 
■SfTfVRXPJT WMr KTTfVr THirifVw I 
TTI <I7g Tf<U ct^f cf^T XffsTTI II » || 
^tu xr^^Tri ofi $r Tiler I 
sfamiraT^if® TH>ii tit? mw ii ^ ii 
W^lIflT ^flTtvfcH ?ier^iriTrTi:i3^T ITS!' 
iTTKTi feirfercr: wum T'sn^r^rsi-T i 
* The original has A little on is °5T^ft- also, 
f Corrected from qf^tfsqvfffr^. We have a strange word here. Others 
of the same kind are an< l The last qualifies a name near tho 
end of the inscription, and seems to denote an office. 
% One line ending with an erasure, and the next beginning with 
I have not hesitated to assume, that the missing symbol was xjj. 
§ The in this compound is quite worn away ; and it has been inserted on 
conjecture. 
|| Here, and on several occasions below, a masculine substantive is turned 
into a neuter. 
.As is usual in documents of this sort, the laws of sandhi are freely neglected, 
IT The word “ boundary,” survives, in Malava, in the same sense, under 
the form of 
