190 
Remarks on the above by R. C. Bayley } JEsq. [No. 2, 
“ Wardak” inscription, and with what seems to be the purport of the 
unfortunately imperfect inscription sent by Major Pearse from Eusof- 
zye, in which the words “ mata, pita” occur in conjunction. 
The inscription from Bimaran, (see Thomas’s Prinsep’s essays, Yol. 
I. Pi. VI. and p. 105) is also a dedication of a reliquary for the pros¬ 
perity (pusae) of “ Sri v&diitra - - - dhatra putra,” probably one at 
least of Col. Cunningham’s Eusofzye inscriptions has a similar 
meaning. 
The conjectural reading, therefore, which I have ventured to sub¬ 
mit of the present inscription, has so far additional probability, that 
its general object and purport is that which seems the most common 
in inscriptions of the same class and period. 
s 
>. 
7 
