ON ETHNOGRAPHICAL PHILOLOGY. 187 
bularies do not ^ree with each other. Lyon’s vocabulary differs from Den¬ 
ham's, and Caillie's from both. 
(a.) 
English. 
beard 
hand 
icater 
Timbuctoo of Lyon. 
heti 
akhood 
ami 
Timbuctoo of Denham. 
kabi. 
kamba. 
hary. 
wood 
esheri 
(h.) 
togoolee. 
English. 
Kissour of Cailli^. 
Howssa. 
Timbuctoo of Lyon< 
ass 
forka 
saki 
ehaid. 
bad 
fante 
mugui 
ferri. 
heard 
kabi 
gemeh 
heti. 
come 
ka 
sakka 
ka. 
drink 
nine 
sha 
ushti. 
eat 
lemlem 
tsbi 
tai. 
eye 
nemodi 
idu 
aiti. 
Jire 
nonnez 
wuta 
oh. 
hand 
lamba 
hana 
akhood. 
head 
komo 
koi 
agodi. 
horse 
bari 
dohki 
ais. 
house 
ho 
clahki 
bactoo. 
man 
harre 
namizi 
ahioda. 
meat 
ham 
nawa 
taaso. 
fiesh 
harao. 
milk 
oi 
noMo 
alebbi. 
moon 
idou 
wata 
hitti. 
mouth 
mi 
bahki 
fetti. 
nose 
nini 
hantahi 
hostL 
river 
hissa 
korarama 
bori. 
sleep 
kana 
kuana 
auti. 
small 
kini-kini 
kauana 
hatch. 
sun 
ouena 
ran a 
odtti. 
water 
hari 
rua 
ami. 
woman 
honi 
matshi 
afintoo. 
wood 
toucouri 
itatshi 
esheri. 
, ^®*^pectto the discrepancies between the Timbuctoo of Denham and 
he Kissour of CaiUi«?, difference is the rule, agreement the exception. Out 
® a considerable list of words common to the two vocabularies, the only 
ones that closely coincide are the following: — 
Eoglisfa. 
beard 
foot 
hand 
milk 
\cater 
earth 
gold 
wood 
Denham’s Timbuctoo. 
Kissour of Cailli^ 
kabi 
kabi. 
kay 
nakidi 
kamba 
lamba. 
wah 
oi. 
hary 
hari. 
gunda 
ganda. 
oorah 
hora. 
togoolee 
toucouri. 
The SuDgai of Hodgson and the Klisour of Cailli6 coincide. 
«the comparison between Lyon’s Timbuctoo and Cailii^’s Kissour was 
