104 
REPORT—1847. 
fhfr™ f «’* combinations or mm,, 
there is a marked difference in favour of education, or, in other words, therefS 
l^ov-l^.h" umnstructed criminaU in those sections where crime i. 
Slow umnstructed criminals where crime i, 
In^ will appear, thstmUieiectioo 
ac?e.^ I ;r„f “;i public, and r« 
l i" pret-rdinff abstract, there will,« the ame 
at! increased j-atio of uninsiructed cri.iiioaJs when compared »4 ibe 
die^iv gro^P. »»«c difftrcooe beia? S G per cent. Again, uke 
ire ^ ^-n“? ’“r manufacturing and agricultural iiesa 
Zr ct^ ' n ■ section of lea .1 crime there 
r^ni^enri mmmiOs. Also, take the two sections of that gmup 
by onJ enm f-f ® ‘J'® "'’efUfie b^ 33* per cent,, and is less tLifthe arerage 
cx^ime of Himut 41 ^^ows an increased 
tc^reaent!^ ?n h?nrl as in the other gmupi 
tented Th#> . 1 : fri ceding abstract, n recnarkabic combinnlioii of featuies b pit* 
JhC dhtricN 1 Sf,f if which the general iKipnUtlon is worstedoci, 
there u the ®”me prevails.and thedistrieUip which 
H-liileoD fheosirftlAl mimstructcd criminals, constaiitJj- asmmiiawii 
tion is found of unin^rr.. V* f*®fd crimiiiol, and in which n less pnpor. 
fore of tlin^e vri' fft" invariably combining. The agreement, there* 
that ^ concluMve. and to eTtabIhh .uafact 
idwoys a nowerful or instruction carry vdth them 
hixher seme nS As already stated, education in iu 
ol'^education will ‘hssever itself from crime, nod this eminent degree 
countn’* blit there ”f of attainment to thu whole population of wiy 
flucfvce of education on *’ ’* devoted to an esajnioation of the in- 
in the Homisoflzco returns^*"^ Pofms of crime, orcordiug to the classification given 
1 hw branch of the subject is considered by him under the following heads;- 
1 . Offences against the person. 
s! oS-ll l^rT't committed with A iolence. 
4 . 
The form®* 
to dctcrtninc, if pmS 7 whethSr*Ilf.^“®^ now thrown, was done witha viev 
tion of criminals committed fnr T** what, difference m the eduts* 
nre abstracted the followine farr 77 “’JS offences ; and a table, from whkj 
neither rend nor wiite was^h? i. * that the proportion of criminds whocouW 
cent, in the formS^r and ^ 5. being neorlv^ 
^ho could read am! write 7 -■'g"®* “>e ratio of lk«e 
>n class fi. Those also ^ per'cent.. and higf.« 
the same two classes beinw 5 w£ 7 °'* were likewise lowest aud highot a 
. 'I'hc preceding results wfro f^ ^ft** P®*" * 
»n»tances exactly reverslTf^ lul 5*!! they were found to be in 
read nor write was lowesf fr,!! * i « the entire of those whocanneif^f 
^eng 47 * 3 * per ceilr ^ P®*- and highest forcI*«i. 
•nstunre occurred in tlie S” r*o •':***•* i^3ii-^9, it appears'ihst not * « »:;« 
5>**« 4 lu able to i 7 d and being retuwoJ " 
n ciMset 2 and 5, not a sinffl P‘^®*c^ing a superior education; w *Im 
female having been commfrr in the whole of those fouryeais of» 
tted possessing superior instruction. Tables were pi<- 
