124 
REPORT— 1847. 
ciirred in the particular language of Takeli, belonging to the Nubian grmip d 
African languages:— 
English. 
Tumali. 
Takeli. 
Fire 
ib6 
cbe 
U’oman 
nyfinu 
jane 
iidger 
engiarr 
Hone 
niarha 
murda 
Star 
leng 
lain 
Sun 
due 
ani 
Sheep 
tri 
dark 
Head 
adg 
aik 
Neck 
iiduk 
endore 
Water 
iigai 
eka 
!• urtliennore, the only fact in the Tumali grammar known to me is a characteristk 
viz. the euphonic alliteration. 
1 1j« i umuli has also iniacellanuuus uffinitios with the vocabularies of Coke and 
Mm, Killiam. 
On some Fazoglo Wortlsfrom Dr. Tutsebek's Vocahulary. 
By R. G. Latham, M.D, 
riio bazoglo words with which I was favoured by Dr. Tutschek were fewer in num¬ 
ber for the purposes of comparison than those of the Tumali. Allowing, however, 
i^ur this, the former language aeoms to be* less like any .“ifrican dialect of which we 
havu specimens than the latter. It has, nevertheless, miscellaneous affinities both 
a* compared with tho vocabularies of i)r. Heke and those of Mrs. Kilham. 
Notice oj the Ghadamsi Dialect of Berber. By Professor Newmas. 
Mr. Jamca Richardson has brought homo from the Great Desert certain contribo- 
tionw lu oiw knowledge of the Uhadumsi and Tuaryk dialects. They consistoftwe 
ahort vocabMlarics, one of which has been printed, a Tuaryk alphabet, and the third 
chapter urhUethow, translated into the Ghaclainsi. In this dialect Graberg de 
llrmso had already communiented a glossary, and a fable of Lokniant; but a* the 
u let was not accompanied by a literal translation, no very distinct knowledge of ibe 
maject could be gleaned from it. Mr. Renouard, however, w.is able to deduce, tbit 
e IwigiMigc wai really a branch of the Berber, in spito of the very itroog ind 
siarUmp difficrences. " 
chapter of Mattliew will shortly be printed, by the order of the Foreira 
ce, with an interlincary translation into Larin, which Mr. Newman ha? succcedii 
m executing*. Almost every word in Lokmans fable also is now explicable, aud ibu* 
cannot he a momenfs doubt as to the Ghadamsi lieing (in every ethnt^phica! iom) 
. , .*1 it is impossible to judge whether a man of GhadaoicseaaW 
#.*•« •*'11 with a Knbuil. The personal pronouns are modiiWi 
^ *!i demonstrative and relative systems are so diifermt 
> hose nf Kabail, that it needs close analrsis to ascertain tlieir relation. lk« 
viw^uiary M not only altered by the introduction of a different set of Arabic ineis 
rl' n*^,**". “ diffi-renl set of native words), but when the vocabulsf)' i* p“te 
rwm all Arabic, the Ghadamai and the Kabail are often quite unlike, and ibeinw 
y o Muads 18 not to be aecoanted for bv any mutation of consonant*. biD* 
1 ctnw) s glossary six worcU arc found, which' give the idea that the Gbadarari bn » 
c opmeiii of the verb essentially Averse from anj'thing yet proved and knotn 
couccming the other dialecU. They are: 
j/a*ekr, faciens j ywakr, factus I sahard, fact! 
awtran, focientea j tuskar, | or/bro«a/, facta: 
ascertaincl that the Faroglo of Tiitsrhek was the Zfiniini.rW 
tho di8cov.irJ^it”k L)t. Tutschek did the same, ainl has since ccunffliiniaitsd 
which nin«»-.'.i !• communicated a grammatical sketch of the Tumali 
Jological Sof-iJiy ^ *** «inarka on the Fazo^o, is published in the Trauaaclions of the Fb'* 
t rublishcd by the Asiatic Society. 
♦ wnce pnntcd (Nov. 1847) with an extension of the vocabulary. 
