BIBLIOGRAPHY. 
301 
Lankester, E. R. —Are the. Coralline Crag of Suffolk and the Black 
Crag of Belgium contemporaneous Deposits ? Geol. Mag., vol. iy., p. 91. 
-.—On the Structure of the Tooth in Ziphius Sowerbiensis . . 
and on some Fossil Cetacean Teeth. Trans. Microsc. Soc., ser. 2, vol. xy., 
p. 56. 
Taylor, J. E.—The Upper and Lower Crags in Norfolk. (Norwich Geol. 
Soc.) Geol. Mag., yol. iy., pp. 331-333. 
1868. 
Anon.—T he Norwich Geological Society’s Excursion to Aldeby. 
Norwich Mercury, June 27 
-.—British Association Meeting. Programme of the Excursions. 
The Excursion to Cromer. Remarks by J. Gunn, R. A. C. Godwin- 
Austen, and W. B. Dawkins. Norfolk News, August 29. 
Charlesworth, E.—On the Prospectiye Annihilation of the Suffolk Red 
Crag Phosphatic Stones, “Coprolite” (Norwich Geol. Soc.). Geol. Mag., 
yol. y., p. 577. 
-.—The Large Fossil Tooth in the Pakefield Cliff. La^id and 
Water, March 14. 
--—.—On the discoyery, at Whitlingham, of the Tooth of the 
Mastodon. {Norwich Geol. Soc., May 5.) Norwich Mercury. 
-.—On the Crag Fossils in the Norwich Musuem. {Norwich Geol. 
Soc.) Norwich Mercury, June 6. 
Oroweoot, W. M. and E. T. Dowson.—[Letter relatiye to the Beds at 
Kessingland.] Norwich Mercury, Oct. 10. 
Dawkins, W. ,B.—On the Dentition of Rhinoceros Etruscus,. Falc. 
Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., yol. xxiy., p. 207. 
-.—On a New Species of Deer from the Norwich Crag., Ibid.,- 
p. 516. 
-.—On the Value of the Evidence for the Existence of the Mam¬ 
moth in Europe in Pre-glacial times. Geol. Mag., yol. y., pp. 316-321. 
Falconer, H.—On the Species of Mastodon and Elephant occurring in 
the Fossil state in Great Britain. Part. I. Mastodon. Part II. Elephant. 
On the European Pliocene and Post-Pliocene Species of the Genus 
Rhinoceros. Notes on Fossil Species of Cervus, including a description 
of a remarkable Fossil Antler of a large Species of extinct Ceryus, 
G. {Eucladoceros) Sedgwickii, in the collection of the Rev. John Gunn, 
Irstead. In “ Palgeontological Memoirs and Notes of the late H. 
Falconer,” by Dr. C. Murchison, yol. ii., pp. 1, 76, 309, 466, 471. 8yo. 
London. 
Fisher, O.—On the Denudations of Norfolk. {Brit. Assoc.) Geol. Mag., 
vol. y., p. 544-568. 
Godwin-Austen, R. a. C.—Address to the Geological Section of the 
British Association, Norwich, August 19, 1868. Geol. Mag., vol. v., p. 469, 
[contains 2 paragraphs not in Bejp. Brit. Assoc.'] and Bep. Brit. Assoc. 
for 1868 (published 1869), and Geol. Nat. Hist. Bepertory, vol. ii., p. 229. 
Gunn, J.—On the Alternate Elevations and Subsidings of the Land, and 
the Order of Succession of the Strata in Suffolk and N orfolk. Geol. Nat. 
Mist. Bepertory, vol. ii., p. 234,. ? and, under a different title, in Norwicn 
Mercury and Norfolk News. 
-.—On an Excursion to Chillesford. Norwich Mercury, April 11. 
-.—Notes on the Chillesford Clay at Kessingland. Ibid., 
December 9. 
-.—On some recent discoveries at Happisburgh. Norwich 
Mercury, March 7. 
-.—(Red and. Coralline Crag Shells obtained at Bramerton.) 
{Norwich Geol. Soc., May 5.) Norwi^ Mercury. 
Lankester, E. R.—The Suffolk Bone-bed and the Diestian or Black 
Crag in England* Geol. Mag., vol. v., p. 254. 
. Maw, G.—On the Disposition of Iron in variegated Strata. Quart. 
Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxiv., p. 351. (Suffolk, pp. 356, 357-377.) 
