66 
Ward. E. W.— 
. 27. Additional Particulars Respecting the Mining Operations at Clunes_ 
&c. Sydney Mag. Sci. and Art, II., p. 80. Sydney, 1859. 
Creswick and Smeaton District. 
Allandale, Clementston, Creswick, Dean, Kingston, Moorookyle , 
Smeaton, Spring Hill, Ullina, &c. 
Boring Records.— 
1. Allandale, Bore Rec. I., 1884, p. 14 (Loughlin Co.); 28, 29.. 
34 (Berry Consols Co.); 29 (Madame Berry Co.); 32-33, 1 PL 
(Madame Berry West Co.); XI., 1895, p. 77, 1 PI. (West Berrv 
Consols Co.) v. also Smeaton; 1902, p. 61, 1 PI. (Berry Consol's 
Co.) 
2. Australasian Extended Co. v. Creswick. 
3. Berry Consols Co. v. Allandale, Kingston, and Spring Hill. 
4. Berry Consols Extended Co. v. Smeaton. 
5. Berry No. 1 Co. v. Smeaton. 
6. Berry United Co. v. Ullina. 
7. Campbelltown. Bore Rec., 1900, pp. 121-123, 1 PI. ; 1901,. 
P- in i i 9 ° 2 > P- 62 ; 
8. Charleson’s Freehold Co. v. Creswick. 
9. Clemenston (Madame Berry Co.). Bore Rec. V., 1889, p. 73. 
1 PI. 
10. Clover Hill Co. v. Smeaton. 
11. Creswick. Bore Rec. I., 1884, pp. 13-14 (Charleson’s Freehold 
Co.); pp. 19-20 (Earl of Beaconsfield Co.); 23-24 (Australasian 
Extended Co.), 1 PL; VIII., 1892, p. 60, 1 PL (Frenchman’s 
Reef); IX., 1893, p. 44, 1 Pi. (Frenchman’s Reef and liard 
Hills); X., 1894,'p. 51, 1 PL (Hard Hills). 
12. Davies’ Freehold Junction Co. v. Spring Hill. 
13. Davies’ Stonebarn Co. v. Kingston. 
14. Dean. Bore Rec., III., 1887, p. 28, 1 PL ; VII., 1891, pp. 81-83. 
1 PL ; VIII., 1892 1 , p. 60, 1 Pi. 
15. Earl of Beaconsfield Co. v. Creswick. 
16. Frenchman’s Gully v. Spring Hill. 
17. Frenchman’s Reef v. Creswick. 
18. Gladstone Co. v. Smeaton. 
19. Great Berry Proprietary Co. v. Smeaton and E'llina. 
20. Hard Hills v. Creswick. 
21. Hepburn Consols Co. v. Smeaton. 
22. Hepburn Estate Co. v. Smeaton. 
23. Hepburn Nos. 2 and 3 Co. v. Smeaton. 
24. Hepburn Deep Leads v. Smeaton. Bore Rec. 1902, p. 61. 1 PL 
1903, P- 93 - 
25. Kaboonga Co. v. Smeaton. 
26. Kingston, Bore Rec. I., 1884, pp. 16-25 (Berry Consols Co.); 
16-17 (Spring Hill Leads Co.); 17 (Richardson’s Consols Co.); 
18-19 (Davies’ Stonebarn Co.); 20 (New Racecourse Co.); 22-23 
(Seven Hills, Loughlin Co.).; 23 (Madame Berry Co.); 24-25 
(Lord Harry Co.), 1 PL; 1902, p. 61, 1 PL (Berrv Consols Co.).. 
27. Lady Hepburn Co. v. Smeaton. 
28. Lord Clvde Co. v. Ullina. 
29. Lord Harry Co. v. Kingston. 
