221 
The rocks are intensely hard and cherty, but do not seem to have undergone 
much compression, as the graptolites are in many cases partly in relief. The 
rocks, however, do not split well, and so the specimens are often imperfectly 
shown, and can rarely be further developed. In many cases the impressions 
are fairly sharp. Ostracods, a brachiopod, and some sponge spicules, are 
present in the collection. 
The specimens have been determined as follows :— 
Tetragraptus approximate, Nicholson.—Nos. 282, 283, 285, 286, 290, 293(?), 
295, 306, 307, 313(?). 
Tetragraptus quadribrachiatus, J. Hall.—Nos. 282, 294, 300(?), 302, 307, 
310, 311, 328, 331, 333, 334, 335. 
Tetragraptus fruticosus, J. Hall.—Nos. 289(?), 291, 330. Specimen No. 330 
is a typical four-branched form, and fixes the Bendigonian age beyond a doubt. 
Didymograptus spp. indet. —Nos. 284, 287, 291. These specimens, though 
well preserved, are too imperfect for identification, being unknown to me. 
Temnograptus sp .—No. 327. This is too much weathered for determina¬ 
tion. It is a large form, though much smaller than T. magnificus, Pritchard, 
and is apparently new. 
Dendrograptus(?), No. 332.—A few small fragments. 
Among Ostracoda, Rhino pterocaris maccoyi is represented by Nos. 283, 
287, and other genera are shown by Nos. 300, 334. No. 294 is a cast of a small 
brachiopod. Sponge spicules, indeterminate, but Hexactinellids, showing the 
third ray are seen on Nos. 311 and 328. The remaining specimens are 
indeterminate. 
University, 25th June, 1903. 
From Junction of Standee’s Creek with the Goulburn River, near 
Wood’s Point. 
No. 326. The specimen submitted appears to be either a Dendrograptus or 
a Dictyonema; it is impossible to say which. Both genera have a very wide 
range, and afford no satisfactory information as to age. The former extends 
from Cambrian to middle devonian (Hamilton), the latter from Cambrian to 
silurian. 
University, 20th July, 1903. 
