LANGURS. 
83 
years 1819 and 1820, has given us an account of a number of doucs which he saw 
during an expedition into the interior of the country, in the course of which it is 
stated that a hundred individuals were slaughtered on a single occasion in the 
endeavour to capture some living specimens. 
The Tibetan Langur, — Semnopithecus roxellance. 
Perhaps the last place in which we should expect to find a living monkey 
would be the highlands of Eastern Tibet. Nevertheless, that one — and a 
very peculiar one—does exist in those elevated regions has been proved by the 
researches of the French missionary, Abbe David, who has done so much to increase 
our knowledge of the fauna of that inaccessible part of the world. The monkey 
in question, which may be known as the Tibetan langur, although a true 
Semnopithecus, may be recognised at a glance among all its congeners by its 
“ tip-tilted ” nose. Although short and small, the nose is so much turned up that its 
tip reaches to the level of the lower border of the eyes. Some writers, relying on 
this peculiar formation of the nose, have separated the species from the other 
langurs under the name of Rhinopithecus , but this multiplication of generic terms 
is confusing and unnecessary. 
Although this remarkable monkey was first made known in Europe from 
specimens obtained in Eastern Tibet, subsequent researches have shown that it also 
ranges into North-West China, where it is found on the mountains of the province 
of Kansu. It appears, indeed, from the researches of the late Professor Moseley, 
that it has been known to the Chinese for an immensely long period. There 
is a Chinese work known as the Shan Hoi King, or mountain and ocean 
record, of very great antiquity,—so old, indeed, that one commentator even assigns 
to it as early a date as the year 2205 B.C.,— in which there is a woodcut representing 
a man of the Heu Yeung Kingdom, wherever that may be. Professor Moseley 
reproduces this figure in his Notes of a Naturalist on the Challenger, and says that 
it evidently represents a monkey closely allied to, and perhaps identical with, the 
species under consideration; the prominent nose turned up at the tip being clearly 
shown in the engraving. Professor Moseley adds that “ the wide but unscientific 
distinction commonly drawn between men and the higher monkeys is an error 
of high civilisation, and comparatively recent. Less civilised races make no such 
distinction. To the Dyak the great ape of Borneo is simply the Man of the Woods 
.—orang-utan.” The Tibetan langur differs from the Indian langurs by its stouter 
build, and relatively shorter limbs. The upper surface of the body, the crown of 
the head, the outer sides of the limbs, and the whole of the tail, are an olive-brown 
colour, flecked with yellow; while the sides of the face, the lower part of the fore¬ 
head, and all the under parts and the inner sides of the limbs, are of a brilliant 
yellow, tending to orange, the naked parts of the face being bluish-grey. 
These langurs inhabit the forests of the mountain region between Moupin and 
Lake Khokonor, where snow is said to lie for a large portion of the year. They 
are stated to live in numerous troops, always ascending the loftiest trees, and 
feeding on fruits, but when pressed by hunger eating also the leaves and shoots 
of the bamboo. 
