55 2 
UNGULATES. 
Hunting-. 
the whole known world had been ransacked by the Romans for beasts for their 
public shows; and I still think it possible that the Carthaginians — the great 
traders and colonisers of old—may have obtained elephants, through some of these 
colonies, from India.” From the disposition of “Jumbo,” it may be inferred that 
the species could be as easily tamed, and would prove as docile as the Indian 
elephant; but there is the difficulty that the natives of Africa probably could not 
be trained to act as efficient drivers, and without a dependable native attendant 
the best elephant would be worse than useless. 
The general testimony of those who have had experience of both 
the African and the Indian elephant points to the conclusion that the 
former is the more dangerous animal of the two, and the one that is more ready 
to charge. The females, especially those that are barren and have small tusks, are 
said to be far more dangerous than males, frequently charging without the least 
provocation, even when unwounded: and it is stated that hunters will sometimes 
take the trouble to kill one of these worthless females before attacking the tuskers. 
Indeed, Mr. W. H. Drummond is of opinion that the greater number of accidents 
that have occurred in African elephant-shooting may be set down to females. 
From the testimony of Gordon Cumming, supported by that of the writer last 
quoted, it would appear that the African elephant, unlike its Indian cousin, charges 
with its trunk uplifted, and loudly trumpeting. 
Previous to the introduction of firearms, it appears that in South 
and South-Eastern Africa, at any rate, the natives but seldom attacked 
the elephant, and effected little, if any, diminution in its numbers. Occasionally, 
as narrated by Livingstone, they attacked the unfortunate animal with assegais, 
and gradually harried it to death from the loss of blood caused by hundreds of 
weapons. In other cases poisoned arrows were the weapons used. A more general 
method is that of digging pits in the paths frequented by the elephants on their 
way to water. These pits, according to Sir S. Baker, are usually twelve or fourteen 
feet in depth, and are covered with light wood and branches or reeds, upon which 
a thin covering of grass is spread. In some cases Sir Samuel states that several 
individuals out of a herd may be captured in this manner in Central Africa; the 
animals being put to death, when thus helpless, with spears. In the Kilima-Njaro 
district, however, the pit system, according to Mr. Hunter, does not appear to be 
very successful. 
Pits. 
Fire During the dry season, when the grass of ten or fourteen feet in 
height is as inflammable as tinder, the natives of Central Africa have 
a cruel way of killing elephants by forming a circle of fire round a herd. As the 
fiery circle, which may be a couple of miles in diameter, gradually contracts, the 
elephants (to quote from Sir S. Baker’s graphic description) “ at first attempt to 
retreat, until they become assured of their hopeless position; they at length become 
desperate, being maddened by fear, and panic-stricken by the wild shouts of the 
thousands who have surrounded them. At length, half-suffocated by the dense 
smoke, and terrified by the close approach of the roaring flames, the unfortunate 
animals charge recklessly through the fire, burnt and blinded, to be ruthlessly 
speared by the bloodthirsty crowd awaiting this last stampede.” As many as a 
hundred, or even more, may be, it is said, killed by this method on a single occasion. 
