542 
[March 
the genus Hesperia. 6. Donovan’s figure is not quite reliable. 7. 
Confused and uncertain. 8. Confusion here; the figures of Boisduval 
and Leconte and those of Abbot and Smith indicate different species. 
9. Of doubtful “habitat.” 
ADDENDA. 
In Index to Authorities. 
Encyclopaedia Brittanica, edition 1855; article and plates on “Ento¬ 
mology.” 
Guerin. —“ Iconographie du Regne Animal ” ; part on Insects. 
Meigen. —“ Systematische Beschriebung der Europaischen Schmetter- 
linge.” 
Scudder. —In “Proceedings of Essex Institute,” Salem; 1863. 
Stoll. —Supplement to Cramer’s “ Papillon Exotiqiies.” 
“ Wiener Entomologische Monatschrift.” 
Westwood & Humphrei/. —“British Butterflies.” 
Additional Species, &c. 
Papilio machaon. Descr. by European authorities. British North America. 
Euterpe bithys, Htibner-Geyer, f. 467. Central America. 
Swainsonii, Griffith, t. 38. Central America. 
Pieris amathonte, Cramer, 1.116 3 9- Central America, 
aripa, Bdvl. Sp. Gen. p. 528. Central America, 
demophile {molphea), Clerck, t. 28. Central America, 
pyrrha {pamela), Cramer, t. 63 , 319 9; Lucas, t. 32. Central America, 
philete, Bdvl. Sp. Gen. p. 550; Fabr. Syst. E. III. Central America, 
pandosia, Hewitson, t. 14, 39. Central America. 
Celias nastes {phicomene is synonymn). British N. A. 
CORRIOENDA. 
In Index to Authorities. 
Martyn. —“ Psyche—figures of nondescript Lepidopterous Insects.” 
London. 
In 1st family, genus 2, for “Orthoptera” read “ Ornithoptera.” 
To Gonepteryx rJiamni, add “Doubtful as American; G. Lorquim., 
a very similar insect, has probably been mistaken for this species. 
