84 
FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. 
65. Eldridge, George H.— 
Report of Geological Investigations. 
U. S. Geol. Sur. 12th Ann. Kept., pt. 1, 82-84, 
1891; ibid 13th Ann. Kept., pt. 1, 117-118, 1892; 
ibid 15th Ann. Kept. 160, (1-4 p.), 1895. 
66. Eldridge, George H.— 
A preliminary Sketch of the Phosphates of 
Florida. 
Am. Inst. Min. Eng. Trans. XXI, 196-231, 1893. 
67. Featherstoohaugh, G. W.— 
Remarks on the oolitic rocks from Florida. 
Am. Jour. Sci. XVI, 206, (1-5 p.) 1829. (From 
Proc. of the Lyceum of National History of New 
York, XV, September, 1828). 
68. Fewkes, J. Walter— 
The Origin of the Present Outlines of the Ber¬ 
mudas. 
Am. Geol. V, 88-100, 1890. 
Reference to Florida occurs on p. 91. Objects to Heil- 
prin’s view that the Florida reefs are an area of elevation. 
Believes that the outlines of the reefs are determined by- 
ocean currents independent either of elevation or subsi¬ 
dence. 
69. Finch, John— 
• Geological Essay on the Tertiary Formations in 
America. 
Am. Jour. Sci. VII, 31-43, 1823. 
Read to Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., July 15, 1823. 
70. Foerste, Aug. F.— 
Studies on the Chipola Miocene of Bainbridge, 
Georgia, and Alum Bluff, Florida. 
Am. Jour. Sci. (3) XLVI, 244-254, 1893. 
