Sg 
Thomaz Rgrgmeier, O. F, M, — Formigas do Brasil 
102, Ph. fPh.) rufipiUs w. levinoéa Forel, Ibidem, 58 (ig08) 
3T2 1 
S. Paulo. Argentina, 
103, Ph. (Ph.) smttfii Da! la Torre, Wien, Ent. Zeit II (1892) 
90 (— diversa Sm, nee Jerdon), 
S. Paulo. 
104, Pk . (Ph.) spie/bergi Emery, Buli, Soc. Ent. ItaL 19 (1887) 
354 % Ç. 
Rio Grande do Sul. 
105, Ph. (P/l) spininoàis Mayr, Verh, z.-b. Ges. Wien 37 (1887) 
591, 005 % Ç (^hoheniohei Em. 1887). 
Brasil Sul. Argentina. 
100. Ph. (Ph.) strobeli Emery, Buli, Soc. Ent, ItaL 54 (1905) 
149 ^ & 
Rio Grande do Sul. Argentina, 
107. Ph. (Ph.) st robe lí ssp, perversa Forel, Verh, z.-b, Ges. 
Wien 58 (1908) 373 ^ Ç>. 
Rio Grande do Sul. 
108, Ph. (Ph.) strobeli ssp. silvícola Borgmeier, Ardi Mus 
Nac. Rio 29 (1928) \ Ç. 
Rio Grande do Sul. 
109, Ph. (Ph.) stulta Forel, Ann, Soc. Ent Belg. 30 (1886) 
C, R, 46 2 j.. 
Brasil. Colombia. 
110. Ph. (Ph.) susmnae ssp. atrlcoior Forel, Ibid, 45 (1901) 
356 Ç cf. 
Rio de janeiro. Colombia. 
11 L Ph. (Ph.) susannae ssp. obscurior Forel, Ibid 30 (1886) 
C. R. 44 2 f. $ (Forel 1893 9 çf). 
Brasil. Colombia. America Central 
