ECHTNOIDEA. (TV, C.) 
Ecliin. 7 5 
pi. xiii : the figures do not belong to the same sp., and neither is 
this sp.; Lambert in Review. S. ambulacrum , descr., distinguished 
fr. S. africanus ; Checchia (40) p. 64, pi. ii: differs from the form 
in the Biarritz Oligocene, and is probably /S'. luddus ; Lambert in 
Review: distinguished fr. S. archiaci ; Oppenheim (210) p. 245. 
S. cw'chiaci probably incl. S. rana Mazz., discussed; op. cit. p. 243: 
descr.; Checchia (40) p. 59, pi. ii: differs from the St. Palais form ; 
Lambert in Review. S. beloutchistanensis D’Archiac & Haime 1853, 
type; Geol. Soc. London (101) p. 45. S. bouziguensis n. sp., 
Helvetian of Herault; Loriol (176) p. 26, pi. iv. /S'. canaliculatus, 
inch both /S'. antiquus and Hemiaster canaliculatus of Upper Garum- 
nian; Gauthier in Grossouvre (116) p. 421. 
Schizaster fragilis , large specimen measured ; Grieg (113) p. 32. 
t/S 'chizaster, —/S'. globulus , discussed, probably incl. Spatangus oblongus 
italicus Quenst.; Oppenheim (210) p. 244. S. cf. karreri ; Schaefer 
(250) pp. 23, 28. /S'. leymeriei , slight differences from type; Lambert 
(161) p. 45. S. luddus \ op. cit. p. 46: Oppenheim (210) p. 252. 
/S’. montserratensis n. sp., Eocene of Montserrat; Lambert (161) p. 42, 
pi. iii. S. newboldi D’Archiac & Haime 1853, type; Geol. Soc. 
London (101) p. 45. S. cf. parkinsoni; Schaffer (250) pp. 23, 24, 
28. A. persicus n. sp., Mid Eocene, Louristan; Gauthier (96) 
p. 176, pi. xxii. S. postalensis (p. 253), S. princeps (p. 243); Oppenheim 
(210). S. pyrenaicus , and /S’. rimosus ; Lambert (161) p. 44: probably 
not this sp.; Lambert in Abstract: redescr.; Gauthier (96) p. 174, 
pi. xxiii. /S'. roemeri discussed; Schlueter (252) p. 328. S. santae- 
mcinzae; Schaffer (250) pp. 23, 28. 4 /S'. spado n. sp., Eocene of 
Catalonia, based on a specimen with only one genital pore; Lambert 
(161) p. 46, pi. iv. S. studeri, distinguished fr. S. rimosus, and fr. 
/S'. afdcanus ; Oppenheim (210^ p. 246: descr., distinguished fr. S. 
africanus ; Checchia (40) p. 61, pi. ii: agrees with Agassiz’ type, but 
nob with Sismonda’s; Lambert in Review: of Checchia (40) probably 
is S. archiaci ; Oppenheim (211) p. 71. S. vidnalis, descr.; Checchia 
(40) p. 66: redescr., 4 genital pores; Gauthier (96) p. 172, pi. xxiii: 
discussed, specimen from Ajka referred to S. ajkaensis ; Oppenheim 
(210) p. 250. /S'. aff. vidnalis ; Schaffer (250) pp. 23, 28. S. vidcili 
n. sp., Eocene of Barcelona; Lambert (161) p. 43, pi. iii. 
t>S •cutella not to be distinguished from Echinarachnius ; Ortmann (212). 
>S. agassizi n. sp. for >S. striatula Ag. non Serres, Middle Oligocene, 
Asterias limest. of Gironde; Oppenheim (211) p. 68. S. bonali n. sp. 
ex Tournouer MS., Aquitanian of Pinderes (Lot-et-Garonne); Loriol 
(176). p. 20, pi. iii. S circularis may be >S. faujasi ; Ortmann 
(212) p. 59. /S', faujasi ; Deydier (68) p. 326: Lebesconte (164) 
p. 279. /S', geometrica Bravard [but probably n. sp.] Tertiary, Punta 
de las Ninfas, Rio Chubut, Patagonia ; Philippi (223) p. 15, pi. ii f. 5. 
/S', jacquemeti n. sp., Helvetian near Lespignan (Herault); Loriol 
(176) p. 17, pi. ii : is this not the true ~S. striatula Serres ?; Lambert in 
Review. S. cf. jacquerneli [sic] ; Deydier (68) p. 321. S. leognanends 
n. sp. based on /S', subrotunda from Bordeaux; Lambert in Review of 
Airaghi (3). /S', lovisatoi Lambert MS.; Lovisato (177) p. 13. /S'. 
melitensis n. sp., Miocene, Malta, form hitherto referred to S. sub¬ 
rotunda or /S', striatida, distinguished from them and from /S', faujasi, 
/S', propinqua, and S. paronai ; Airaghi (3) p. 377, pi. xv: but the 
name is not new, and the form is the type of S. subrotunda ; Lambert 
in Review. /S', patagonensis descr., incl. Echinarachnius juliensis 
Desor, should not form type of separate genus Iheringina, modes 
alatus and rotundatus discussed, movement of anus with growth; Ort¬ 
mann (212) p. 55, pi. xi. /S', paulensis (p. 321), /S', cf. paulensis (p. 314); 
Deydier (68). S. striatula discussed; Airaghi (3) p. 377: what is 
